Kerala CPI blasts Pinarayi over LDF poll rout, toddy sector neglect

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Kerala CPI blasts Pinarayi over LDF poll rout, toddy sector neglect

Synopsis

The CPI's Binoy Viswam has gone further than any allied voice so far — naming Pinarayi Vijayan directly and alleging he privately admitted a toddy policy injustice but refused to fix it. With the LDF now in Opposition and traditional strongholds lost, this is no longer internal grumbling: it is a public demand for accountability that the CPI(M) cannot easily dismiss.

Key Takeaways

CPI state secretary Binoy Viswam publicly attacked former CM Pinarayi Vijayan and the previous LDF government on 18 September 2026 in Vaikom .
Viswam alleged the government maintained a 400-metre restriction on toddy shops while reducing the bar distance restriction to 50 metres — calling it a double standard.
He claimed Vijayan privately acknowledged the CPI's toddy demand was justified at an LDF meeting but took no action over five years.
Viswam said the LDF lost traditional strongholds including Vaikom , Taliparamba , Payyannur , Kodungallur , and Ambalappuzha — losses he called unacceptable.
He alleged even LDF's own party workers did not vote for the coalition, demanding leadership self-examination.
The CPI(M) , already under internal pressure from its own state committee meeting, now faces a public challenge from its principal ally.

Communist Party of India (CPI) state secretary Binoy Viswam has sharpened his public attack on former Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and the previous Left Democratic Front (LDF) government, accusing it of neglecting the toddy sector while the Left coalition reels from a crushing defeat in the Kerala Assembly elections. Viswam's remarks, delivered on Friday, 18 September 2026, at the state conference of the Kerala State Toddy Workers Federation (AITUC) in Vaikom, represent the most direct public criticism yet from the CPI — the second-largest constituent of the LDF — toward its larger ally, the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI(M)).

The Toddy Sector Grievance

At the heart of Viswam's attack is an allegation of unequal treatment between the toddy industry and the bar trade during the LDF's five-year term. He stated that the CPI had repeatedly raised the toddy sector's concerns at LDF coordination meetings, specifically seeking a reduction in the 400-metre distance restriction that toddy shops must maintain from places of worship and educational institutions. The government, he said, did not act on this demand.

By contrast, the distance restriction applicable to bars was reduced to 50 metres — a disparity Viswam described as two different standards being applied to the two trades. He further alleged that Vijayan himself had conceded at an LDF meeting that the CPI's demand was justified, yet no corrective action was taken across the government's full term. 'It is not enough to say that something will be corrected. It has to be corrected,' Viswam said, quoting his own position to the alliance leadership.

The Broader Post-Poll Reckoning

Viswam's remarks extend well beyond the toddy issue. He delivered a pointed message on the LDF's election defeat, calling for honest introspection rather than deflection. He claimed that even the Left's own party workers did not vote for the LDF — an unusually frank acknowledgement of internal disaffection. While he said such abstention by cadre was wrong, he simultaneously pressed the leadership to ask why it came to that point.

'Did we give our comrades enough importance? Did we listen to them? Did we understand them?' Viswam asked, framing the defeat as a failure of internal party culture, not merely electoral arithmetic.

He specifically flagged the loss of traditional Left strongholds — Vaikom, Taliparamba, Payyannur, Kodungallur, and Ambalappuzha — as results that should not have occurred and demanded that the alliance own up to its failures. 'Defeat is defeat. If there was a failure, we must admit that it was a failure,' he said.

Pressure Mounts on CPI(M)

The CPI(M) had already faced sharp internal criticism over the electoral outcome at its own extended state committee meeting held recently. Viswam's public broadside from an allied party adds a second front to that reckoning. This comes amid a broader pattern: smaller LDF constituents have historically deferred to the CPI(M) on policy matters, making this level of open criticism from the CPI notable.

Notably, the LDF is now in Opposition following the Assembly election defeat, and the coalition's collective explanation for losing seats it had held for years remains contested. The CPI's insistence on examining the previous government's functioning — rather than attributing the loss solely to anti-incumbency or external factors — signals a harder internal negotiation ahead over the Left's direction in Kerala.

What Comes Next

The CPI(M) faces growing pressure from within and outside its alliance to conduct a credible accountability exercise. Whether the CPI's demands translate into formal changes to LDF coordination norms or remain rhetorical pressure will shape how coherent the Left Opposition proves to be in the coming years. Observers of Kerala politics will watch whether Vijayan or the CPI(M) leadership responds publicly to Viswam's specific allegations — particularly the claim that Vijayan privately acknowledged the toddy policy was unjust but chose not to act.

Point of View

One that assigns blame squarely to the CPI(M)'s governance choices. The CPI(M) cannot easily dismiss this: the CPI is an alliance partner whose cooperation it will need in Opposition. What is missing from mainstream coverage is the subtext — the CPI is quietly positioning itself for a renegotiated power-sharing arrangement within the LDF, and public pressure on Vijayan is the leverage. Whether the CPI(M) engages or stonewalls will define Left coalition dynamics in Kerala for the next electoral cycle.
NationPress
18 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the CPI criticising former Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan?
The CPI's Binoy Viswam has accused Vijayan and the previous LDF government of ignoring repeated CPI demands to reduce the 400-metre distance restriction on toddy shops, while simultaneously lowering the equivalent rule for bars to 50 metres. Viswam says Vijayan personally admitted the CPI's demand was valid at an LDF meeting but did not act on it during five years in power.
What did Binoy Viswam say about the Kerala election defeat?
Viswam said the LDF must conduct an honest introspection, alleging that even the Left's own party workers did not vote for the coalition. He named specific lost strongholds — Vaikom, Taliparamba, Payyannur, Kodungallur, and Ambalappuzha — and said the leadership must ask why cadre had become so disaffected.
What is the toddy shop distance restriction dispute about?
Under the previous LDF government, toddy shops were required to maintain a 400-metre distance from places of worship and educational institutions. The CPI sought a reduction to this rule, arguing it hurt the traditional toddy industry and its workers. The government reduced the distance rule for bars to 50 metres but did not extend the same relief to toddy shops, which the CPI calls a double standard.
How does the CPI's criticism affect the LDF alliance?
The CPI is the second-largest constituent of the LDF and its public attack on the CPI(M)'s governance record is unusual. The CPI(M) is already conducting an internal inquiry into the election defeat; the CPI's demands add external pressure within the coalition and could complicate efforts to project a united Left Opposition in the Kerala Assembly.
What are the broader implications of the Left's defeat in Kerala?
The LDF lost several constituencies it had traditionally held, and the defeat has triggered a debate within the Left over governance failures, cadre management, and policy choices. The CPI's intervention signals that smaller alliance partners are unwilling to let the CPI(M) set the terms of the post-poll narrative unilaterally.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 3 months ago
  7. 3 months ago
  8. 3 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google