Did the CPI(M) Engage in a Criminal Conspiracy Against Vaishna Suresh?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a shocking revelation, V.D. Satheesan, the Leader of the Opposition in Kerala, claims that CPI(M) executed a criminal plot to remove Congress candidate Vaishna Suresh from the voters’ list. He calls for an investigation by the Election Commission, highlighting serious lapses by officials. This unfolding drama raises questions about electoral integrity in Kerala.
Key Takeaways
- CPI(M) allegedly involved in conspiracy
- Satheesan demands Election Commission investigation
- Serious lapses by officials highlighted
- Legal action threatened by UDF
- Vaishna's voting rights reinstated
Thiruvananthapuram, Nov 20 (NationPress) The Leader of the Opposition in the Kerala Assembly, V.D. Satheesan, accused the CPI(M) on Thursday of orchestrating a “criminal conspiracy” to remove the name of 24-year-old Congress candidate Vaishna Suresh from the voters’ list in the Muttada ward of the Thiruvananthapuram Corporation.
“Two high-ranking CPI(M) officials in Thiruvananthapuram were directly implicated in this conspiracy. Several Corporation officials, who are sympathetic to the CPI(M), also took part in this unlawful act. The Election Commission must launch a thorough investigation and establish a special team for the inquiry; otherwise, the UDF will pursue legal measures,” Satheesan stated.
He pointed out that the order from the State Election Commission, which reinstated Vaishna’s voting rights, underscores significant failures at the official level. Following a complaint from a CPI(M) local leader, the Electoral Registration Officer made a unilateral decision.
“This officer actively supported the CPI(M)’s criminal conspiracy. The Election Commission itself has determined that there was no basis for Vaishna’s name to be removed from the electoral roll,” Satheesan added.
“During the hearing, the officer disregarded any documents presented by Vaishna. Her voting rights were revoked solely based on the claims of a local CPI(M) leader, without her presence. Such officials who conform to the CPI(M) must not remain in their positions even for a moment. Those involved should be suspended, and criminal charges should be brought against them,” Satheesan asserted.
Officials acting as agents of the CPI(M) should keep in mind that their party will not be in power indefinitely, and the time will come when they will be held accountable, Satheesan cautioned.
Interestingly, after her appeal was dismissed by the officials, she turned to the Kerala High Court, which criticized how her petition was managed by the authorities and warned that if they did not take necessary actions, the court would exercise its special powers.
Subsequently, district authorities reinstated her name on the voters' list on Wednesday, and she submitted her nomination papers on Thursday.
Point of View
It's critical to observe how electoral processes are upheld in Kerala. The integrity of the voting system is paramount in any democracy, and such claims warrant an impartial investigation. The implications of this case could set a precedent for how political parties operate and engage with officials in the future.
NationPress
20/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What allegations were made against CPI(M)?
V.D. Satheesan claimed that CPI(M) orchestrated a criminal conspiracy to remove Congress candidate Vaishna Suresh from the voters' list.
What actions did Satheesan demand from the Election Commission?
He called for a comprehensive investigation and the appointment of a special team to probe the matter.
How did the Election Commission respond to the allegations?
The Election Commission reinstated Vaishna's voting rights, indicating serious lapses at the official level.
What will happen if the authorities do not act?
Satheesan warned that the UDF would resort to legal action if the Election Commission does not take necessary steps.
What was the outcome after Vaishna's appeal?
After her appeal was dismissed, she approached the Kerala High Court, which criticized the handling of her case, resulting in her name being reinstated.
