Why Did BJP Criticize Imran Masood and Iltija Mufti Over Their Remarks on Delhi Blast Video?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a controversial exchange, BJP leaders have condemned Congress MP Imran Masood and PDP's Iltija Mufti for their remarks on a video featuring Dr Umar Muhammad, the suspect in the Delhi blast. Their comments have sparked a fierce debate about terrorism and responsibility in India.
Key Takeaways
- BJP's strong response to comments on terrorism.
- Imran Masood's defense of Islamic principles against suicide attacks.
- Iltija Mufti raises concerns about societal violence.
- Political unity against terrorism is emphasized.
- Debate on terrorism and its implications in India continues.
New Delhi, Nov 20 (NationPress) The BJP has strongly criticized Congress MP Imran Masood and Iltija Mufti, a leader of the People's Democratic Party (PDP), following their remarks regarding the viral footage of Dr Umar Muhammad, the suspect in the Delhi blast. In the video, Umar attempts to rationalize suicide bombings as a form of “martyrdom operation” as understood in Islam.
Masood rebutted this assertion, declaring that suicide attacks are “haram” in Islam and suggested that Umar was merely a “misguided youth” responsible for the Red Fort car explosion.
Mufti expressed her personal distress over the video, highlighting her reflections as a Kashmiri on the escalating cycle of violence and alienation. She cautioned that such visuals indicate deeper societal fractures that are being ignored. She noted that while “right-wing groups amplify” these videos, the core issues remain unresolved by authorities.
The BJP responded fiercely, accusing the two leaders of attempting to “justify” an attack that resulted in the deaths of at least 13 individuals and left numerous others injured.
BJP national spokesperson Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi criticized the leaders, claiming they align with proxy groups in Pakistan that advocate terrorism. He stated, “Whenever our security forces take action against terrorists, their discomfort becomes apparent.”
BJP leader Pratul Shah Deo also condemned the comments made by Mufti and Masood, asserting that calling Umar a “misguided youth” discredits the gravity of his actions. He urged them to reconsider their stance, stating, “If you wish to guide him on the ‘right path’, perhaps Pakistan would be more suitable.”
The Samajwadi Party distanced itself from the remarks made by Masood and Mufti, emphasizing the importance of political unity against terrorism. SP spokesperson Abbas Haider remarked, “All citizens, regardless of religion or community, stand united against terrorism.”
He added that while the government has yet to eradicate terrorism completely, they remain committed to supporting efforts to eliminate it.
Point of View
It is imperative to approach the statements made by both Imran Masood and Iltija Mufti with an unbiased lens. Political discourse should never undermine the seriousness of terrorism, and all parties must unite against this menace that affects every citizen. The focus should remain on constructive dialogue and solutions rather than justifications.
NationPress
20/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What sparked the BJP's criticism of Imran Masood and Iltija Mufti?
The BJP criticized them for their comments on a viral video of Dr Umar Muhammad, who justified suicide attacks, which the BJP viewed as an attempt to legitimize terrorism.
How did Imran Masood respond to the video?
Imran Masood countered the justification of suicide attacks by stating that they are 'haram' in Islam and described Umar as a 'misguided youth'.
What was Iltija Mufti's perspective on the video?
Iltija Mufti expressed her distress, highlighting the need for reflection on violence and societal issues in Kashmir.
What has been the response from the Samajwadi Party?
The Samajwadi Party distanced itself from the remarks made by Masood and Mufti, emphasizing the need for political unity against terrorism.
What are the implications of these political statements?
The implications highlight a growing divide in political rhetoric regarding terrorism and the necessity for unified action against it.
