Why Did a Delhi Court Deny Rabri Devi’s Request to Transfer Corruption Cases?

Click to start listening
Why Did a Delhi Court Deny Rabri Devi’s Request to Transfer Corruption Cases?

Synopsis

A Delhi court's recent ruling against Rabri Devi's plea to transfer corruption cases highlights the ongoing legal challenges faced by the Yadav family. This decision opens the door for continued scrutiny of their alleged misconduct in high-profile cases, including the IRCTC hotel scam and land-for-jobs allegations.

Key Takeaways

  • Delhi court dismisses transfer pleas by Rabri Devi.
  • Cases include the IRCTC hotel scam and land-for-jobs allegations.
  • Judge Gogne's conduct was questioned by the defendants.
  • The CBI and ED firmly opposed the transfer requests.
  • Ongoing cases remain under the same judicial oversight.

New Delhi, Dec 19 (NationPress) In a significant blow to former Bihar Chief Minister Rabri Devi and her family, a Delhi court has dismissed requests to move several corruption and money-laundering cases from the court of Special Judge Vishal Gogne.

Principal District and Sessions Judge Dinesh Bhatt of the Rouse Avenue Courts rejected four transfer petitions submitted by Rabri Devi, which involved the IRCTC hotel scam, the CBI's land-for-jobs case, and two related money-laundering investigations by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).

With these pleas turned down, all criminal proceedings against Lalu Prasad Yadav, Rabri Devi, Tejashwi Yadav, and other family members will remain under the jurisdiction of Special Judge Vishal Gogne.

Rabri Devi argued for the transfer, claiming that the trial judge's conduct created a “reasonable apprehension of bias.” She alleged that Judge Gogne appeared “unduly inclined towards the prosecution” and was pursuing charges against her family with a premeditated agenda.

Other accused, including members of the Yadav family, supported her petitions, asserting that their cases were being handled with unusual speed.

Senior advocate Maninder Singh, representing Rabri Devi, pointed out that although Judge Gogne had nearly 29 pending cases, none were being processed as quickly as the four involving the former Chief Minister and her family. He noted that these cases had been listed 117, 70, 50, and 28 times respectively between January 1, 2025, and December 14, 2025.

The CBI and the ED vehemently opposed the transfer requests, labeling them as attempts to “discredit the judge” and “intimidate the courts.”

Special Public Prosecutor D.P. Singh for the CBI contended that the allegations of bias were groundless and slanderous, emphasizing that Judge Gogne was adhering to established legal procedures.

The district judge had previously solicited responses from both central agencies and requested feedback from Judge Gogne, who submitted a reply in a sealed envelope.

The IRCTC hotel scam involves alleged misconduct in the leasing of IRCTC hotels from 2004 to 2009, during which time Lalu Prasad served as the Union Railway Minister. Charges under Sections 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act were recently ordered to be framed.

In the land-for-jobs case, the CBI alleges that individuals seeking Group-D posts in the Railways transferred land to members of Lalu Prasad’s family or their proxies in return for employment.

Earlier today, the Rouse Avenue Courts reserved its decision regarding the charge framing in this case, while the ED continues its inquiry into the money-laundering aspects, claiming that the transactions produced illicit gains that were subsequently laundered through various entities.

Point of View

This ruling underscores the judiciary's commitment to maintaining the integrity of legal proceedings, particularly in cases involving high-profile political figures. The dismissal of the transfer petitions reflects a firm stance against potential attempts to influence judicial processes, ensuring that justice is served impartially.
NationPress
22/12/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of Rabri Devi's plea?
The Delhi court rejected Rabri Devi's requests to transfer multiple corruption and money-laundering cases from Special Judge Vishal Gogne.
What cases are involved in this ruling?
The cases include the IRCTC hotel scam, the CBI's land-for-jobs case, and two related money-laundering prosecutions by the Enforcement Directorate.
What reasons did Rabri Devi give for the transfer request?
Rabri Devi claimed that Judge Gogne's conduct created a 'reasonable apprehension of bias' against her and her family.
How did the CBI and ED respond to the transfer requests?
Both agencies opposed the transfer pleas, stating they were attempts to undermine the judge and the court's authority.
What are the implications of this ruling for the Yadav family?
The ruling means that all ongoing criminal cases against the Yadav family will continue to be overseen by the same judge, potentially affecting their legal strategy.
Nation Press