PACL fraud: ED attaches ₹567 crore properties in Mumbai, Pune under PMLA

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
PACL fraud: ED attaches ₹567 crore properties in Mumbai, Pune under PMLA

Synopsis

Ten years after launching its investigation, the ED has now attached over ₹30,235 crore in the PACL case — with the latest ₹567 crore sweep in Mumbai, Pune, and Raigad targeting properties linked to a fugitive accused. India's biggest collective investment fraud, which allegedly robbed lakhs of small investors of ₹48,000 crore through fake land-development promises, continues to yield fresh recovery action.

Key Takeaways

The ED attached 48 immovable properties worth ₹567.45 crore in Mumbai , Pune , and Raigad on 8 October 2026 .
Properties are held in the names of Prateek Kumar , Ansh Prateek Kumar , and entities Beaming Infradevelopers , Ganraj Properties , and Greenfield Estates Limited .
PACL allegedly defrauded investors of over ₹48,000 crore through a fake agricultural land development scheme.
Total ED attachments in the PACL case now stand at approximately ₹30,235.21 crore , including overseas assets.
An open-ended Non-Bailable Warrant against accused Prateek Kumar remains active since 9 April 2025 .
The ED's ECIR was first registered in 2016 ; six supplementary charge sheets have been filed across 2022 , 2025 , and 2026 .

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on 8 October 2026 attached 48 immovable properties in Mumbai, Pune, and Raigad (Maharashtra) worth ₹567.45 crore, in connection with the Pearls Agrotech Corporation Limited (PACL) collective investment fraud — a scheme that allegedly swindled more than ₹48,000 crore from lakhs of investors across India. The action was taken by the ED's Delhi Zonal Office under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002.

Properties Attached and Key Accused

The 48 attached properties are held in the names of Prateek Kumar, Ansh Prateek Kumar, and three entities — Beaming Infradevelopers, Ganraj Properties, and Greenfield Estates Limited — all of which are reportedly beneficially owned and controlled by Prateek Kumar. According to the ED, investigation revealed that these properties were purchased using funds diverted directly from PACL — money that had originally been collected from investors — thereby constituting proceeds of crime.

Prateek Kumar was arraigned as accused A-13 in the First Supplementary charge sheet filed on 20 August 2022, with cognisance taken by the Special Court on 19 September 2022. An open-ended Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) was subsequently issued against him on 9 April 2025.

Scale of the PACL Fraud

PACL operated what authorities describe as a massive illegal collective investment scheme, fraudulently mobilising more than ₹48,000 crore from investors under the pretext of purchasing and developing agricultural land. Investors were lured through cash down payment and instalment plans and made to sign misleading documents — including agreements and powers of attorney. 'In most cases, land was never delivered, resulting in unpaid investor dues of around ₹48,000 crore,' the ED said in its official statement.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) registered an FIR in New Delhi under Sections 120-B and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 — dealing with criminal conspiracy and cheating — which formed the basis of the ED's own investigation. The CBI subsequently filed a charge sheet and a supplementary charge sheet against 33 accused.

ED's Cumulative Action in the Case

The ED first recorded an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) in 2016 and filed its initial charge sheet in 2018, followed by six supplementary charge sheets in 2022, 2025, and 2026. With the latest attachment, the ED has cumulatively attached movable and immovable properties worth approximately ₹30,235.21 crore, including assets located both in India and abroad. Notably, this makes the PACL case one of the largest money laundering recovery drives in Indian enforcement history.

Background: A Decade-Long Legal Battle

The PACL case dates back over a decade, representing one of India's most significant investor fraud investigations. The scale of the alleged fraud — mobilising funds from lakhs of small investors through promises of land development — drew comparisons at the time to other Ponzi-style collective investment schemes that had devastated retail investors. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) had earlier ordered the winding up of PACL's investment schemes and directed the firm to refund investors, laying the groundwork for criminal and enforcement proceedings that followed. This latest attachment signals that ED's recovery drive, now spanning nearly a decade, is still actively widening its net.

What Happens Next

The attached properties will be subject to further proceedings before the Special Court hearing the PMLA case. Authorities have not disclosed a timeline for investor refunds from recovered assets, which remain subject to prolonged legal adjudication. With the NBW against Prateek Kumar still open-ended, investigators are expected to intensify efforts to trace remaining proceeds of crime.

Point of View

The cumulative ₹30,235 crore in attachments shows the machinery can grind forward, but at a pace that offers cold comfort to the lakhs of retail investors still awaiting refunds. The open NBW against Prateek Kumar, issued in April 2025 but yet to result in an arrest as of this attachment, raises questions about the ED's extradition and fugitive recovery capacity. More fundamentally, the PACL fraud endures as a cautionary tale about the regulatory gaps in collective investment scheme oversight — gaps that SEBI has since moved to tighten, but which existed long enough for ₹48,000 crore to vanish from ordinary savers' hands.
NationPress
8 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the PACL investment fraud case?
PACL (Pearls Agrotech Corporation Limited) allegedly ran an illegal collective investment scheme, fraudulently collecting more than ₹48,000 crore from lakhs of investors across India under the guise of purchasing and developing agricultural land. In most cases, no land was ever delivered to investors. The CBI registered an FIR for criminal conspiracy and cheating, and the ED opened a money laundering investigation in 2016.
Why did the ED attach properties in Mumbai, Pune, and Raigad?
The ED attached 48 properties worth ₹567.45 crore because investigation revealed they were purchased using funds diverted from PACL — money originally collected from defrauded investors — making them proceeds of crime under the PMLA. The properties are linked to accused Prateek Kumar and entities he reportedly controls.
How much has the ED recovered in the PACL case so far?
With this latest action, the ED has cumulatively attached movable and immovable properties worth approximately ₹30,235.21 crore in the PACL case, including assets located both in India and abroad. The attachments span nearly a decade of enforcement action since 2016.
Who is Prateek Kumar and what is his role in the case?
Prateek Kumar is listed as accused A-13 in the First Supplementary charge sheet filed on 20 August 2022 in the PACL money laundering case. He is alleged to beneficially own and control the entities whose properties have been attached. An open-ended Non-Bailable Warrant was issued against him by the Special Court on 9 April 2025.
What happens to the attached properties next?
The attached properties will be subject to further proceedings before the Special Court hearing the PMLA case. Any eventual recovery from these assets could be directed toward compensating defrauded investors, though the timeline for refunds remains subject to lengthy legal proceedings.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 2 weeks ago
  3. 3 months ago
  4. 4 months ago
  5. 7 months ago
  6. 8 months ago
  7. 9 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google