Why is the Haryana Rights Panel Warning Faridabad DC and Municipal Commissioner?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Haryana Human Rights Commission has taken a firm stance against the repeated non-compliance of its orders by Faridabad officials. With potential fines looming, the situation raises critical questions about accountability and the enforcement of human rights protections in the region.
Key Takeaways
- Haryana Human Rights Commission is serious about enforcing its directives.
- Officials face a potential Rs 20,000 fine for contempt.
- Complaints highlight critical issues such as poor infrastructure and environmental violations.
- Continued non-compliance raises questions about accountability.
- The next hearing is scheduled for September 22.
Chandigarh, July 17 (NationPress) The Haryana Human Rights Commission has expressed serious concerns regarding the continuous non-compliance of its orders by officials from the Faridabad district administration and the Faridabad Municipal Corporation.
In a decisive move, the commission announced on Thursday that it has issued show-cause notices to both the Deputy Commissioner and the Municipal Commissioner, warning them of a Rs 20,000 fine per case for contempt of its directives.
Commission member Deep Bhatia, while delivering the order, underscored that failing to comply with the commission's directives "not only constitutes contempt of law but also impedes justice for the affected individuals".
In a complaint, the Deputy Commissioner, the Executive Engineer (PWD B and R), and the Block Development and Panchayat Officer of Tigaon were repeatedly instructed to provide a report.
Despite a formal communication from the Deputy Commissioner on May 16 to the concerned officials, no report was submitted, nor did any officer attend the commission.
"This reflects a negligent and indifferent attitude towards a significant human rights issue," remarked the commission.
Indraraj Singh, a resident of Bukharpur village in Ballabgarh tehsil, has reported in his complaint that the primary access road to his village is in a state of severe disrepair, causing considerable hardship for the villagers.
The conditions are so poor that they are compelled to navigate through a neighboring village to reach their destination.
Indraraj Singh noted that the situation becomes particularly challenging during the rainy season, creating major obstacles for students, the elderly, and the ill. The complaint also states that he has made numerous appeals to the administration for the construction of an alternative road, yet no significant action has been taken thus far.
Similarly, in two additional complaints, no official from the Faridabad Municipal Corporation appeared or submitted a status report, despite explicit instructions from the commission.
On April 22, the commission had specifically mandated that a senior official must appear in person with the latest report and any pertinent court orders. These directions were also disregarded.
Complainant Deepak Tripathi, a resident of Kapda Colony, NIT Faridabad, brought to light breaches of environmental regulations by industrial entities in the Faridabad vicinity and the improper disposal of contaminated water.
He claimed that such pollution is negatively impacting public health, while the relevant departments, particularly the Haryana State Pollution Control Board (HSPCB) and the Municipal Corporation of Faridabad, have failed to take adequate action on the issue.
Due to repeated infractions, the commission has issued the show-cause notices to both the Deputy Commissioner and the Municipal Commissioner of Faridabad under Section 13 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, demanding that they justify why a Rs 20,000 fine per case should not be levied against them for willful disobedience.
Puneet Arora, Protocol, Information and Public Relations Officer, stated that the commission has instructed the relevant officials or their authorized representatives to appear in person and present the necessary reports at the upcoming hearing dates.
The commission has scheduled the case for the next hearing on September 22.
Point of View
It is essential to uphold the rule of law and ensure that local administrations respect human rights directives. This incident highlights the ongoing struggle for accountability in governance and the need for effective oversight mechanisms to protect the rights of citizens.
NationPress
17/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What led to the Haryana Human Rights Commission's warning?
The commission issued warnings due to the repeated non-compliance of its orders by officials from the Faridabad district administration and Municipal Corporation.
What fines are officials facing for contempt?
Officials are warned of a fine amounting to Rs 20,000 per case for ignoring the commission's directives.
What are the specific complaints mentioned?
Complaints include the poor condition of access roads and environmental violations by industrial units impacting public health.
What actions has the commission taken?
The commission has issued show-cause notices to the Deputy Commissioner and Municipal Commissioner for their non-compliance.
When is the next hearing scheduled?
The commission has set the next hearing for September 22.
