Is Music Maestro Ilaiyaraaja Fighting for His Musical Ownership?

Click to start listening
Is Music Maestro Ilaiyaraaja Fighting for His Musical Ownership?

Synopsis

In a recent court hearing, legendary composer Ilaiyaraaja declared that film producers cannot sell his compositions without his consent. The case raises crucial questions about musical ownership and intellectual property rights, as the battle for control over iconic songs intensifies. Will the court side with the maestro?

Key Takeaways

  • Ilaiyaraaja asserts ownership of his musical works.
  • Producers cannot sell or license music without consent.
  • The case addresses important issues of intellectual property in the arts.
  • Financial implications for producers are significant.
  • Legal clarity is needed in music ownership disputes.

Chennai, Nov 6 (NationPress) The renowned music maestro Ilaiyaraaja asserted in the Madras High Court on Thursday that film producers lack the authority to sell or license his musical compositions to music labels or third parties without his direct consent.

During the proceedings with Justice N. Senthilkumar, the composer’s lawyer A. Saravanan maintained that Ilaiyaraaja’s musical creations are his intellectual property and should not be classified as assets belonging to the producers.

Saravanan argued that no employer-employee relationship exists between the composer and any film producer. He clarified that the payments made to him were intended to cover the expenses for musicians, recording engineers, and technical personnel, rather than for transferring ownership of his musical works.

“A cinematograph film and its musical score are distinct entities. While producers can manage the overall film, they cannot sell the rights to the music separately without my client's approval,” he emphasized.

The lawyer highlighted that Ilaiyaraaja has never relinquished his rights to any of his songs and challenged music labels to provide proof otherwise.

He further accused current users of his compositions of “distorting and mutilating” the original pieces by altering their rhythms and beats to accommodate contemporary trends.

This statement was made during a hearing regarding an application from Telangana-based Mythri Movie Makers, producers of the Ajith Kumar film Good Bad Ugly (GBU), who are seeking to lift an interim injunction imposed on September 8, 2025, preventing them from using three of Ilaiyaraaja’s cherished compositions — Otha Ruba Tharen from Nattupura Pattu (1996), Ilamai Idho Idho from Sakalakala Vallavan (1982), and En Jodi Manja Kuruvi from Vikram (1986).

Senior counsel P.V. Balasubramaniam, representing the production company, argued that his client legally acquired the rights to use these songs from various music labels, paying amounts ranging from Rs 10 lakh to Rs 40 lakh for each.

He explained that the firm is currently facing financial difficulties due to the injunction, despite acting in good faith.

Lawyers representing the music labels claimed that they had obtained the rights several decades ago from major studios such as AVM Productions, asserting that Ilaiyaraaja had not signed any agreements preventing those producers from selling the rights. They argued that if the composer had any grievances, they should be directed toward the original film producers, not the labels or subsequent users.

In response, Saravanan insisted that anyone wishing to utilize Ilaiyaraaja’s music must seek his direct permission.

“If others have been misled into making payments to music labels without verifying rightful ownership, it is not my client's responsibility,” he stated. After hearing all arguments, Justice Senthilkumar reserved judgment on the request to annul the injunction.

Point of View

The ongoing dispute over musical ownership highlights the critical need for clear intellectual property laws in the entertainment industry. Ilaiyaraaja’s stance reinforces the importance of protecting creators' rights and ensuring fair compensation for their contributions. As the case unfolds, it serves as a vital reminder of the complexities surrounding ownership in the rapidly evolving landscape of music and film.
NationPress
06/11/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main issue in Ilaiyaraaja's case?
The primary issue revolves around whether film producers have the right to sell or license Ilaiyaraaja's musical compositions without his consent.
How does Ilaiyaraaja view his musical works?
Ilaiyaraaja considers his musical creations as his intellectual property, separate from the assets of film producers.
What are the implications of this case?
The outcome may set a precedent for how musical rights are treated in the film industry, impacting future agreements and ownership disputes.
What is the role of the music labels in this case?
Music labels claim they obtained rights to Ilaiyaraaja's compositions from film producers and argue that any grievances should be directed at those producers.
What does Ilaiyaraaja's lawyer argue?
His lawyer argues that anyone wishing to use his music must obtain direct permission from Ilaiyaraaja, as he has never surrendered his rights.
Nation Press