Did the J&K HC Rule That a Bank's Liability Ends After Payment to a Surviving Account Holder?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Bank's liability ends after payment to the survivor.
- The 'either or survivor' clause is legally binding.
- Disputes post-payment are civil matters.
- Rights of surviving account holders are upheld.
- Other High Court rulings support this decision.
Srinagar, Dec 3 (NationPress) The J&K and Ladakh High Court announced on Wednesday that a bank is completely relieved of its obligations once it disburses the remaining balance of a joint account with an 'either or survivor' provision to the surviving account holder.
Justice Sanjay Dhar emphasized in his ruling, “A bank is entirely liberated from responsibility when it transfers the balance of a joint account with an 'either or survivor' provision to the surviving account holder. Any further disputes between the surviving account holder and the legal heirs of the deceased should be resolved in civil court, and the bank cannot be held criminally accountable for complying with the 'either or survivor' clause.”
The High Court additionally noted that other judicial decisions, including those from the Madras High Court, affirm that the right to manage the account transfers to the survivor following the death of one of the account holders.
The ruling specified that the bank's obligation is to release the funds to the surviving account holder according to the 'either or survivor' directive.
“Compensating the surviving holder is a complete and legitimate discharge of the bank's duties. Any contention regarding entitlement to the funds, after they have been disbursed to the survivor, is a civil issue between the survivor and the legal heirs. This does not warrant criminal action against the bank. The 'either or survivor' mandate constitutes a contract between the account holders and the bank. By agreeing to this clause, the account holders authorize the bank to release the balance to the surviving party,” the ruling stated.
The principle that the right to operate the account is transferred to the surviving holder is corroborated by various High Court judgments across India. For instance, in a decision from 2005, the Madras High Court declared that the survivor is the sole individual entitled to the funds in such accounts.
Justice Sanjay Dhar made these observations while approving two petitions submitted by Shabeena Ibrahim and HSBC, both of whom faced allegations in a criminal complaint filed by Mir Usman Disooki.