Pralhad Joshi Accuses Congress of Misinforming Public on VB-G RAM G Scheme
Synopsis
Union Minister Pralhad Joshi has accused the Congress party of misinforming the public about the VB-G RAM G scheme. He emphasizes transparency and employment guarantees while contrasting party positions amid ongoing protests.
Key Takeaways
Pralhad Joshi asserts that Congress is spreading misinformation regarding the VB-G RAM G scheme.
The scheme guarantees 125 days of employment for rural citizens.
Advanced monitoring technologies will enhance transparency and reduce corruption .
Protests against the scheme were held by the Congress party in Bengaluru .
Karnataka's Chief Minister has criticized the scheme as burdensome for states.
Hubballi (Karnataka), Feb 28 (NationPress) Union Minister for Food and Public Distribution, Pralhad Joshi, accused the Congress party of disseminating misleading information regarding the Viksit Bharat—Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act (VB-G RAM G) scheme.
During an event held at the BJP district office in Aravind Nagar, Hubballi, Joshi engaged with party members about the VB-G RAM G initiative.
He claimed that in the past, there were significant fund leakages under the MGNREGA scheme, with widespread corruption.
Additionally, he alleged that fraudulent job cards were being generated, stating that the new system aims to eradicate such discrepancies, arguing that Congress opposes it for this very reason.
Joshi asserted that the VB-G RAM G scheme, initiated by the NDA government, guarantees 125 days of employment for rural citizens.
He emphasized that with the incorporation of AI-driven monitoring, biometric attendance, and digital audits, the entire operation will be transparent.
According to Joshi, the VB-G RAM G initiative will significantly diminish corruption, bolster the rural economy, and represent a crucial step toward establishing a 'Viksit Bharat'.
The event also saw the presence of Rajya Sabha BJP MP Narayansa Bhandage, State Legislative Council member S.V. Sankanoor, and several other local leaders and dignitaries.
In contrast, the Congress party organized a major protest at Freedom Park in Bengaluru on January 27, opposing the VB-G RAM G scheme introduced by the BJP-led Union government.
Notably, the Union government replaced the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) in December 2025.
Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah described the VB-G RAM G scheme as an 'anti-people law', asserting that this new employment guarantee Act imposes a financial burden on the states.
Furthermore, he mentioned that the Congress-led government intends to inscribe Mahatma Gandhi's name on buildings across all 6,000 gram panchayats in Karnataka.
Point of View
The ongoing debate surrounding the VB-G RAM G scheme highlights a significant political divide. While the government promotes transparency and employment guarantees, opposition parties raise concerns over potential negative impacts. The discourse emphasizes the need for responsible communication and informed public engagement.
NationPress
6 May 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the VB-G RAM G scheme?
The VB-G RAM G scheme is an initiative by the NDA government that guarantees 125 days of employment to rural citizens, aiming to provide job security and reduce corruption.
Why is Congress opposing the VB-G RAM G scheme?
Congress claims that the VB-G RAM G scheme is an 'anti-people law' that places financial burdens on states, while also protesting against its implementation.
What measures are being put in place to ensure transparency in the VB-G RAM G scheme?
The scheme incorporates AI-driven monitoring, biometric attendance, and digital audits to enhance transparency and curb corruption.
Who attended the recent event discussing the VB-G RAM G scheme?
The event was attended by several dignitaries, including BJP MP Narayansa Bhandage and various local party leaders.
What was the response of Karnataka's Chief Minister to the VB-G RAM G scheme?
Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah criticized the VB-G RAM G scheme, labeling it an 'anti-people law' and expressing concerns about its financial implications for the state.
