Will CM Vijayan Ensure Justice for the Actor Assault Survivor?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Thiruvananthapuram, December 16 (NationPress) - In the aftermath of the ruling in the actor assault case, the survivor met with Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan at his official residence on Tuesday. During their discussion, the Chief Minister conveyed his support, stating that the people of Kerala are united behind her, and confirmed that the State government would swiftly file an appeal against the trial court’s ruling.
Furthermore, he indicated that the government would take measures regarding the video published by the second accused, Martin.
Steps have already been initiated to contest the trial court's decision in this case.
The prosecution is preparing to dispute significant elements of the verdict, particularly the acquittal of the eighth accused, actor Dileep, among others.
A comprehensive report detailing the legal basis and potential for appeal has been compiled by the Special Public Prosecutor. Based on this evaluation, the procedure for drafting the appeal is currently underway after a thorough examination of the trial court's ruling.
The trial court sentenced six defendants to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment. However, given the time they have already spent in custody, their remaining sentences have been adjusted. Consequently, the first accused, Pulsar Suni, and the second accused, Martin, will each serve an additional 13 years in prison.
The third accused, Manikandan, and the fourth accused, Vijeesh, received sentences of 16 years and 6 months each, while the fifth and sixth accused, Salim and Pradeep, are to spend another 18 years in jail.
Earlier that day, the victim participated in a Christmas event hosted by Vijayan. Adding a new layer to the case, the investigating officer, Baiju Paulose, has notified the Director General of Police about an anonymous letter that claims details of the verdict were leaked prior to its official announcement.
Previously, the president of the High Court Advocates’ Association lodged a complaint with the Chief Justice after receiving the letter. However, this matter has caused internal conflicts within the association, leading to a lack of consensus on the appropriate course of action.