Will the Kerala Police Take Action Over a Video Disclosing a Survivor's Identity?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Kerala Police are likely to take action against the video.
- A complaint was filed by the survivor with the Chief Minister.
- The video was posted by a convicted individual, Martin Antony.
- Legal experts indicate that revealing a survivor's identity is illegal.
- The survivor continues her pursuit of justice.
Thiruvananthapuram, Dec 17 (NationPress) The police in Kerala are poised to initiate legal proceedings regarding a video circulating on social media, which allegedly disclosed the identity of the survivor from the 2017 actress assault incident.
This action is in response to a formal complaint lodged by the survivor with Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, urging measures against those who disseminated the video.
During a meeting with the Chief Minister at the Cliff House on Tuesday, the survivor expressed her fears about renewed harassment and online vitriol triggered by the video.
She called for urgent intervention to halt the further spread of content that infringes on her privacy.
According to sources, the police are currently scrutinizing the complaint and the relevant legal frameworks concerning the disclosure of a sexual assault survivor’s identity.
The video was uploaded by Martin Antony, who has been convicted in the case and is serving a 20-year prison sentence.
In the footage, Antony asserts that actor Dileep was not involved in the crime and claims the case was a fabrication stemming from a conspiracy.
This video emerged shortly before the trial court's verdict, which acquitted Dileep and the others involved, drawing significant backlash.
During their discussion, the survivor received assurances from the Chief Minister that the state government would appeal the trial court’s decision that acquitted Dileep and the other accused.
The details of the case and the judgment were thoroughly reviewed, with the Chief Minister affirming the government's unwavering support for the survivor.
She conveyed her dissatisfaction with the ruling and her resolve to continue the legal fight until justice prevails.
In the controversial video, Antony makes bold claims, including that the incident never took place and that multiple film personalities are involved in a conspiracy.
Officials noted that these allegations were scrutinized during the trial and dismissed by the court.
The survivor categorically rejected the video's contents as untrue and deceptive.
Legal experts emphasized that disclosing a sexual assault survivor's identity is a criminal act under the law, regardless of the individual’s status or identity.
Sources from the police indicated that subsequent actions would follow a preliminary review of the complaint and digital evidence.