CAB election forgery: Kolkata Police file FIR against two DTDC employees
Synopsis
Two DTDC employees have been booked on non-bailable forgery charges for allegedly generating fake consignment numbers to manipulate Cricket Association of Bengal election documents — and DTDC's own brand ambassador is CAB President Sourav Ganguly, adding a charged dimension to a case that could upend the association's 24 September AGM.
Key Takeaways
Kolkata Police registered an FIR at Maidan Police Station against two DTDC employees over alleged election document forgery.
The accused are Arghya Das (channel management executive) and Shubham Bakshi (Taratala-Gopalpur branch manager).
They allegedly created fake consignment numbers with no traceable history on DTDC's tracking portal to manipulate dispatch of CAB election documents.
Charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) include forgery, cheating, criminal breach of trust, and criminal conspiracy — most are non-bailable .
The documents relate to elections for Secretary , Joint Secretary , and Apex Council posts at the CAB AGM on 24 September 2026 .
CAB President Sourav Ganguly is DTDC's brand ambassador; he has not been named in the FIR.
Kolkata Police have registered an FIR against two employees of courier company DTDC over alleged forgery and document manipulation linked to the upcoming Cricket Association of Bengal (CAB) elections, scheduled around the Annual General Meeting on 24 September. The case, lodged at Maidan Police Station, follows a complaint alleging that the courier firm — in collusion with a section of CAB officials — tampered with the dispatch of election-related documents to affiliated clubs.
Who Has Been Named
The FIR names Arghya Das, channel management executive at DTDC, and Shubham Bakshi, manager of the company's Taratala-Gopalpur branch, as the primary accused. The complaint was filed by Gautam Dey, a member of the Calcutta University Institute, after a preliminary inquiry at Maidan Police Station. Investigators also visited the CAB office in Kolkata as part of the probe.
What the FIR Alleges
According to police sources, the accused allegedly generated fake consignment numbers and passed them off as genuine when dispatching election documents. Those consignment numbers reportedly had no traceable history on DTDC's own tracking portal. The accused are also alleged to have sent couriers in violation of prescribed procedures, and to have acted with the intent of giving certain candidates an unfair advantage in the election process.
The documents in question relate to the election of the Secretary, Joint Secretary, and Apex Council members of the CAB — key positions to be decided at the AGM. The complaint additionally alleges that a section of CAB officials was complicit in the alleged forgery, broadening the scope of the investigation beyond the courier firm.
Charges Invoked
Police have booked the accused under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including charges of forgery of valuable documents, forgery with intent to cheat, use of forged documents as genuine, criminal breach of trust, cheating, and criminal conspiracy. According to police sources, most of the offences are non-bailable in nature.
The Ganguly Connection
The development carries added significance given that Sourav Ganguly — the CAB President and former Indian cricket team captain — is the brand ambassador of DTDC. While Ganguly has not been named in the FIR, his dual role as head of the CAB and public face of the courier company involved has drawn attention to the case. It is not yet clear whether investigators intend to question CAB leadership directly.
What Happens Next
With the CAB AGM set for 24 September 2026, the investigation's timeline is tight. A Kolkata Police team has already visited the CAB office for preliminary fact-finding, and further arrests or summons cannot be ruled out as the probe advances. The case has cast a shadow over the credibility of the election process at one of Indian cricket's most influential state associations.
Point of View
The optics corrode confidence in the CAB's administrative neutrality. Indian state cricket associations have a long history of election disputes, but evidence of forged courier consignments — verifiable or not on a tracking portal — marks an unusual escalation. With the AGM just days away, the Election Commission of Cricket has no formal authority here; it falls to the courts and police to determine whether the tainted process can proceed, or whether it should be stayed pending a full inquiry.
NationPress
15 Sept 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the CAB election forgery case about?
Kolkata Police have filed an FIR against two DTDC courier employees who allegedly generated fake consignment numbers to manipulate the dispatch of election-related documents ahead of the Cricket Association of Bengal AGM on 24 September 2026. The complaint also alleges that a section of CAB officials was involved in the scheme.
Who are the accused named in the FIR?
The FIR names Arghya Das, channel management executive at DTDC, and Shubham Bakshi, manager of DTDC's Taratala-Gopalpur branch, as the primary accused. The complaint was filed by Gautam Dey, a member of the Calcutta University Institute.
What charges have been filed and are they bailable?
The accused have been charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), covering forgery of valuable documents, forgery with intent to cheat, use of forged documents as genuine, criminal breach of trust, cheating, and criminal conspiracy. Police sources say most offences invoked are non-bailable.
What is Sourav Ganguly's connection to this case?
Sourav Ganguly, CAB President and former Indian cricket captain, is the brand ambassador of DTDC — the courier company at the centre of the FIR. Ganguly has not been named in the case, but his dual role has attracted scrutiny given that the forgery allegations directly concern CAB election documents.
Could the CAB AGM on 24 September be affected?
The CAB Annual General Meeting is scheduled for 24 September 2026, and the elections under scrutiny relate to posts including Secretary, Joint Secretary, and Apex Council members. With police actively probing CAB's own office, the investigation's outcome could potentially cast doubt on the integrity of the process before the AGM takes place.
