Did the Madras HC Confirm Misconduct Against Kancheepuram District Judge?

Click to start listening
Did the Madras HC Confirm Misconduct Against Kancheepuram District Judge?

Synopsis

In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court confirmed misconduct allegations against Kancheepuram District Judge Pa.U. Chemmal. This decision follows his controversial order for the judicial custody of a DSP amidst a personal dispute, prompting immediate action from the Vigilance Committee. What are the implications of these findings for judicial integrity?

Key Takeaways

  • Madras High Court confirms misconduct allegations.
  • Judge Pa.U. Chemmal ordered custody of a DSP.
  • Vigilance Committee to review the inquiry findings.
  • Coercive actions against local businesses were reported.
  • Immediate disciplinary measures are being considered.

Chennai, Sep 23 (NationPress) The Madras High Court has validated claims of misconduct against Kancheepuram Principal District and Sessions Judge Pa.U. Chemmal. Earlier this month, Chemmal ordered the judicial custody of a Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) amid a personal conflict involving his former Personal Security Officer (PSO).

Justice N. Sathish Kumar, after reviewing an inquiry conducted by Registrar (Vigilance) Jacintha Martin, instructed the High Court Registry to present the findings to the Vigilance Committee, composed of senior judges, for potential disciplinary action.

He emphasized the urgency of the situation, stating that it was “not conducive” for the judge to remain in Kancheepuram.

This directive followed a petition from the Kancheepuram Superintendent of Police, who contested the district judge’s decision to place the DSP in custody on September 8.

On September 9, Justice Sathish Kumar swiftly overturned that ruling and mandated a vigilance inquiry into the allegations.

As reported by Additional Public Prosecutor K.M.D. Muhilan, statements were gathered from the Superintendent of Police, the DSP, and the judge’s former PSO, R. Lokeshwaran, for the inquiry.

The investigation uncovered that the judge had coerced law enforcement to file charges against Lokeshwaran and his father-in-law, a bakery owner, suspecting them of disseminating false information regarding him. The DSP was reportedly detained for failing to apprehend the former aide.

Moreover, the inquiry revealed additional misconduct, including the judge's alleged attempts to pressure a Food Safety Officer into conducting a raid on the bakery. The FSO confirmed this during his testimony.

The report also highlighted further instances of misconduct, such as undue pressure on a local pharmacy that had declined to dispense medication without a legitimate prescription.

After thoroughly evaluating the findings, Justice Sathish Kumar concluded that the evidence supports the allegations of judicial power misuse. He mandated that appropriate disciplinary actions be initiated as soon as possible.

Point of View

The validation of misconduct allegations against a sitting judge raises profound concerns about the integrity of the judiciary. Such incidents undermine public trust and highlight the necessity for rigorous oversight and accountability within the justice system. It is essential to ensure that judicial power is not abused, maintaining the rule of law and public confidence.
NationPress
23/09/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the allegations against Judge Pa.U. Chemmal?
Judge Pa.U. Chemmal faced allegations of misconduct, including pressuring police to arrest individuals and attempting to influence a Food Safety Officer.
What actions did the Madras High Court take?
The Madras High Court directed an inquiry into the allegations and recommended immediate disciplinary measures against Judge Chemmal.
Who conducted the inquiry?
The inquiry was conducted by Registrar (Vigilance) Jacintha Martin.
What were the findings of the inquiry?
The inquiry found that the judge had misused his judicial powers, including coercive actions against local businesses.
What is the significance of this ruling?
This ruling underscores the importance of accountability in the judiciary and aims to restore public trust in the legal system.
Nation Press