Is MNS the Biggest Loser in the Alliance with Uddhav Thackeray?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Pune, Jan 17 (NationPress) In a striking post-election analysis, Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis argues that the MNS has emerged as the biggest loser in the alliance with Uddhav Thackeray, following BJP’s sweeping win in the BMC elections. This critique raises questions about the effectiveness of political partnerships.
Key Takeaways
- BJP's victory in the BMC elections marks a significant political shift.
- MNS is perceived as the biggest loser in the alliance with Uddhav Thackeray.
- The alliance did not yield any substantial gains for Raj Thackeray's party.
- Uddhav Thackeray claims mutual benefits in the coalition.
- The BJP continues to dominate across various voter demographics.
Pune, Jan 17 (NationPress) Following the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) remarkable win in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections, Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis on Saturday sharply criticized the partnership between the Thackeray brothers. At a victory rally and subsequent press conference, CM Fadnavis labeled Raj Thackeray’s Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) as the “biggest loser” in this political coalition, asserting that his earlier predictions regarding the MNS–Shiv Sena (UBT) alliance had been confirmed by the election results.
Even with the prominent alliance of Uddhav and Raj Thackeray, the MNS only secured a mere eight seats.
“It was politically evident that MNS would be the biggest loser in this partnership. My forecast has been validated by the outcomes. While this alliance favored Uddhav Thackeray, Raj Thackeray and his party gained absolutely nothing,” stated CM Fadnavis.
In response, Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Uddhav Thackeray rejected the idea that the alliance was one-sided. He highlighted that an MNS candidate won in the ward containing the Shiv Sena Bhavan, suggesting this indicated shared benefits.
“There was complete synergy between the workers of both parties. Wherever we campaigned, we witnessed no division between MNS and Shiv Sena supporters. We fought this battle with a united heart,” Thackeray emphasized.
Regarding the BJP’s triumph in the BMC elections, CM Fadnavis remarked it was “all touching and all-pervading,” breaking down traditional caste and language barriers.
“The Marathi man of Mumbai, perceived by some as their private property, is now firmly standing with the BJP. Our corporators have achieved victories in slums, high rises, chawls, and Koliwadas. There isn’t a single area where the BJP did not find success,” he noted, attributing the party’s ongoing dominance since 2014 to PM Modi’s leadership.
CM Fadnavis also stated that despite contesting fewer seats than the opposition, the BJP maintained a higher strike rate and vote share.
Point of View
The critique by CM Fadnavis underscores the volatile nature of political alliances in India. The outcomes of the BMC elections reveal not only the BJP's strategic maneuvering but also the potential pitfalls for parties like the MNS when engaging in partnerships. This situation merits close observation as it could reshape future electoral strategies.
NationPress
17/01/2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What did CM Fadnavis say about the MNS?
CM Fadnavis described the MNS as the 'biggest loser' in the alliance with Uddhav Thackeray, claiming that the results validated his predictions.
How many seats did the MNS win?
The MNS managed to secure only eight seats in the BMC elections.
What was Uddhav Thackeray's response?
Uddhav Thackeray dismissed the idea that the alliance was one-sided and highlighted the success of an MNS candidate in a key ward.
What impact did the BJP have in the BMC elections?
The BJP achieved significant victories across various demographics, breaking traditional barriers and winning in diverse areas.
What does this mean for future political alliances?
The results indicate a potential reevaluation of political strategies and partnerships, especially for parties like the MNS.
