Mysuru Dasara row: Royal family may withdraw Golden Howdah from govt

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Mysuru Dasara row: Royal family may withdraw Golden Howdah from govt

Synopsis

The Mysuru Dasara celebrations have ended in a political storm: Rajamata Pramodadevi Wadiyar has put the Karnataka government on notice, warning she may stop lending the iconic Golden Howdah after alleging police ill-treatment and a 45-year information blackout over the Ambari elephant's selection. With the BJP piling on and the Congress scrambling to pacify the palace, the row raises a pointed question about who really owns one of India's most iconic festivals.

Key Takeaways

Rajamata Pramodadevi Wadiyar warned she may reconsider handing over the Golden Howdah (Ambari) to the Karnataka government for future Mysuru Dasara celebrations.
She alleged police high-handedness, ill-treatment of royal family members, and said Ambari elephant information was withheld for nearly 45 years until the last moment.
Yathindra Siddaramaiah defended the government, saying it pays for the Ambari and had kept channels open with the royal family before the festival.
Deputy Chief Minister G.
Parameshwara said no new traditions were broken and offered to personally meet the Rajamata to resolve grievances.
BJP state president B.Y.
Vijayendra accused Chief Minister D.K.
Shivakumar of prioritising publicity over Karnataka's cultural conventions.
The Rajamata has not yet approached the High Court but has flagged it as a possible recourse if state actions continue to obstruct royal traditions.

Rajamata Pramodadevi Wadiyar of the Mysuru royal family has threatened to reconsider handing over the Golden Howdah (Ambari) to the Karnataka government in future editions of the Mysuru Dasara festival, alleging police high-handedness and ill-treatment of royal family members during this year's celebrations. The warning has ignited a political firestorm, drawing sharp criticism from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and prompting the ruling Congress government to move swiftly to contain the fallout.

What the Rajamata Alleged

In a letter released to the media on Sunday, Pramodadevi Wadiyar said information about the elephant chosen to carry the Ambari had been withheld from the royal family for nearly 45 years — until the last moment this year. She said she was compelled to seek details herself by directly contacting the Deputy Conservator of Forests (DCF).

The Rajamata alleged that royal family members faced police high-handedness and ill-treatment, and questioned the overall manner in which the government managed this year's arrangements. She also noted that the Jatti Kalaga event was cancelled during the Vijayadashami celebrations, adding to the family's grievances.

Pramodadevi maintained that the royal family's Navaratri observances were rooted in religious ritual and bore no connection to the government-organised Dasara spectacle. She warned that if state actions continued to obstruct the family's traditional practices, the royal family could approach the High Court, though it had not done so yet. She also suggested that the Ambari procession from Mysuru Palace to Bannimantap on the occasion of Chamundi Rathotsava could be a more appropriate format going forward.

Government's Response

Urban Development Minister and Mysuru District In-charge Minister Yathindra Siddaramaiah defended the administration, clarifying that the government pays for the use of the Ambari and that the arrangements were made with the cooperation of both parties. He noted that officials had been in touch with the royal family and had invited its members to share their expectations ahead of the festival.

'The Ambari in which the idol of Chamundeshwari is placed is the property of the palace, and we pay for it. Dasara should be conducted properly with the cooperation of the government and the royal family,' he said. Yathindra added that Pramodadevi had issued her letter directly to the media rather than first approaching the government, and assured that officials would now speak to her to address the concerns.

Deputy Chief Minister G. Parameshwara also sought to calm the situation, saying the government had carried forward the tradition in the same manner established since the royal family's administrative role in the celebrations was transitioned to the state. 'Nothing new has been attempted by the Chief Minister. There is no reason for her to feel hurt. If she has felt hurt in any way, we will visit her and rectify the situation,' he said.

BJP Targets Shivakumar

BJP state president B.Y. Vijayendra launched a pointed attack on Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar, alleging that the Chief Minister had prioritised personal publicity over Karnataka's cultural traditions. Vijayendra objected specifically to Shivakumar bringing his wife to the Jamboo Savari inauguration and procession, calling it a breach of established convention.

Vijayendra also drew attention to the Bengaluru Chinnaswamy Stadium stampede, which claimed 11 lives, alleging that a publicity contest between former Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Shivakumar had contributed to the controversy around that event. He further criticised the reported absence of photographs of Deputy CM Parameshwara and the district in-charge minister from official Dasara coverage, alleging the ruling party had placed self-promotion above convention.

What Happens Next

The state government has indicated its officials will meet Pramodadevi Wadiyar to address her grievances directly. Yathindra Siddaramaiah reiterated that the palace board and palace land are under government jurisdiction, but stressed that the administration respects the royal family and intends to maintain its cooperation for future Dasara celebrations. The row is likely to keep the spotlight on how Karnataka manages one of India's most prominent cultural festivals heading into the next Dasara cycle.

Point of View

Not a miscommunication; it signals the palace has exhausted quieter channels. The BJP's pivot to 'publicity over tradition' is politically convenient but not entirely without substance — the Chinnaswamy Stadium stampede and the Jamboo Savari row both point to a pattern of event management that has repeatedly placed optics ahead of safety and protocol. If the state cannot resolve this before next year's Dasara planning begins, the dispute risks becoming an annual fixture, which neither the government nor Karnataka's tourism brand can afford.
NationPress
26 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why has the Mysuru royal family threatened to withdraw the Golden Howdah from Dasara?
Rajamata Pramodadevi Wadiyar alleged that the Karnataka government withheld information about the Ambari elephant's selection for nearly 45 years, that royal family members faced police ill-treatment, and that the Jatti Kalaga event was cancelled without adequate reason. In a letter to the media, she warned the royal family may reconsider lending the Golden Howdah for future Dasara celebrations.
What is the Golden Howdah (Ambari) and why does it matter?
The Golden Howdah, known as the Ambari, is an ornate gold-plated seat placed on the back of the ceremonial elephant during the Mysuru Dasara procession, carrying an idol of Goddess Chamundeshwari. It is the centrepiece of the Jamboo Savari procession and belongs to the Mysuru royal family, which lends it to the government for the annual celebrations.
How has the Karnataka government responded to the Rajamata's allegations?
Urban Development Minister Yathindra Siddaramaiah clarified that the government pays the royal family for use of the Ambari and that arrangements were made cooperatively. Deputy Chief Minister G. Parameshwara said no new traditions were broken and offered to visit the Rajamata personally to address her concerns. Both ministers indicated officials would meet her to resolve the dispute.
What has the BJP said about the Mysuru Dasara controversy?
BJP state president B.Y. Vijayendra accused Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar of prioritising personal publicity over Karnataka's cultural traditions, citing objections to Shivakumar bringing his wife to the Jamboo Savari and the alleged sidelining of other senior ministers in official coverage. Vijayendra also linked the controversy to the Bengaluru Chinnaswamy Stadium stampede, which claimed 11 lives.
Could the royal family take the dispute to court?
The Rajamata mentioned the High Court as a possible recourse if the government's actions continued to obstruct the family's traditional religious observances, but confirmed the family had not filed any petition so far. She indicated the option remains open should the situation not improve.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 days ago
  2. 4 days ago
  3. 5 days ago
  4. 6 days ago
  5. 3 months ago
  6. 3 months ago
  7. 3 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google