Are Two NDA Leaders Really Holding Duplicate Voter IDs?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Tejashwi Yadav's bold accusations against NDA leaders spark questions about election integrity. With allegations of duplicate voter IDs and collusion with the Election Commission, the Bihar political scene is heating up. Will this lead to accountability or further controversy?
Key Takeaways
- Tejashwi Yadav has alleged that two NDA leaders possess duplicate voter IDs.
- Accusations point to serious irregularities in the electoral process.
- The integrity of the Election Commission is under scrutiny.
- Political tensions in Bihar are escalating ahead of the elections.
- Transparency and accountability are crucial for public trust.
Patna, Aug 14 (NationPress) In a new twist in the lead-up to the Bihar Assembly elections, RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav has leveled serious allegations against NDA figures Dinesh Singh and Veena Devi, claiming they possess duplicate Elector Photo Identity Card (EPIC) numbers and are listed as voters across multiple constituencies.
In a post on X, Yadav asserted that JD(U) MLC Dinesh Singh holds two EPIC IDs -- REM0933267 and UT01134527 -- registered in different Lok Sabha and Assembly constituencies situated in separate districts.
He also alleged that Singh submitted two distinct counting forms during the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process, with signatures on both forms confirmed by Election Commission officials.
Furthermore, Yadav previously claimed that Singh’s spouse, Vaishali MP Veena Devi, is also in possession of two EPIC IDs -- UTO1134543 and GSB1037894 -- and is registered in varying Lok Sabha and Assembly constituencies.
He pointed out discrepancies in her recorded age across the two IDs and mentioned that she submitted two separate forms with differing signatures during the voter list revision, both of which were verified by EC officials.
“This constitutes fraud orchestrated in collusion with the Election Commission, the BJP, and the NDA,” Yadav stated.
“Doesn’t this cast doubt on the impartiality of the Election Commission? Has it become a mere instrument for the BJP’s electoral victories? Is it now serving as a ‘Troll Commission’ or an ‘Earthworm Commission’ focused solely on the ruling party, ignoring the common populace?” he questioned.
He urged the EC to issue notices to Veena Devi and Dinesh Singh from both constituencies and to take appropriate measures.
As of now, both Veena Devi and the Election Commission have not released any official statements. However, these allegations have ignited a new controversy in Bihar’s political landscape, with opposition parties accusing the EC of intentional irregularities aimed at favoring the NDA in the elections.
Political analysts caution that if the EC fails to take action, it could lead to broader questions about the transparency and credibility of the electoral process in Bihar at this crucial pre-election juncture.
Point of View
The allegations made by Tejashwi Yadav reflect significant concerns regarding electoral integrity. As political tensions rise, it is crucial for the Election Commission to address these claims transparently to maintain public trust and uphold democratic values.
NationPress
20/08/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the allegations made by Tejashwi Yadav?
Tejashwi Yadav has accused NDA leaders Dinesh Singh and Veena Devi of holding duplicate voter IDs and being registered in multiple constituencies.
What is the significance of these allegations?
These allegations raise serious questions about the impartiality of the Election Commission and the integrity of the electoral process in Bihar.
Has the Election Commission responded?
As of now, neither Veena Devi nor the Election Commission has issued an official response to the allegations.
What could be the consequences if the EC fails to act?
If the Election Commission does not take action, it may lead to broader concerns about the transparency and credibility of elections in Bihar.
