Why has the Patna administration sent a second reminder to Tejashwi Yadav regarding dual EPIC numbers?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a developing political situation in Bihar, the Patna administration has reached out to Tejashwi Yadav for clarity on possessing dual EPIC numbers. With potential legal implications looming, this saga raises questions about the integrity of electoral processes. Will Yadav provide the answers needed before the deadline?
Key Takeaways
- Patna administration issues second reminder to clarify dual EPIC numbers.
- Deadline set for response by August 16.
- Investigation reveals discrepancies in EPIC documentation.
- Potential legal consequences for forged documents.
- Tejashwi Yadav questions the basis of the allegations.
Patna, Aug 8 (NationPress) The administration in Patna has issued a second reminder to Tejashwi Yadav, the leader of the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) and the Bihar Leader of Opposition, requesting an explanation concerning his possession of two distinct Electoral Photo Identity Card (EPIC) numbers, according to officials on Friday.
The administration has set a deadline for the RJD leader to provide his response by August 16.
A letter from the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) highlighted that during a press conference on August 2, Tejashwi Yadav asserted that his EPIC number was RAB2916120.
However, a search for this number on the Election Commission of India's website after the Special Intensive Revision (SIR)-2025 revealed no results, as the name associated with it was absent from the draft electoral roll.
Further investigation by the district administration confirmed that Tejashwi Yadav's name is included in the voter roll under EPIC number RAB0456228 with serial number 416 at the Bihar Animal Sciences University’s library building, polling station number 204.
This same EPIC number was cited in the RJD leader's affidavits for the 2015 and 2020 Assembly elections, as well as in the documentation submitted to the Booth Level Officer during the SIR-2025.
Officials indicated that the number RAB2916120 presented at the press conference appears to be invalid and potentially forged.
The letter cautioned that the creation and usage of falsified government documents constitutes a criminal offense, instructing Tejashwi Yadav to return the disputed card to the Electoral Registration Officer by 5 p.m. on August 16.
The first reminder regarding this issue was dispatched on August 6, but as Tejashwi Yadav had not yet responded by 5 p.m. on Friday, a follow-up notice was issued.
On Thursday, Tejashwi Yadav addressed the matter of the dual voter ID cards, stating, “We haven't received any notice from the Election Commission. We are responding to the communication from the level of the sub-divisional officer.” He challenged the legitimacy of the complaint, asking: “Who issued the two EPIC numbers? The individual responsible for issuing them is now questioning us about their origin. The error lies with someone else, yet we are being summoned to provide answers.”
Point of View
It is crucial to observe that the request for clarification concerning Tejashwi Yadav's dual EPIC numbers emphasizes the importance of electoral integrity. This situation, while politically charged, sheds light on the administrative processes that ensure transparency in governance. The public deserves clarity and accountability.
NationPress
20/08/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What are EPIC numbers?
EPIC numbers are Electoral Photo Identity Card numbers issued to voters in India, serving as an official identification for electoral participation.
Why did the Patna administration send a reminder?
The administration sent a reminder to Tejashwi Yadav to clarify the discrepancies in his reported EPIC numbers, as having dual numbers raises serious questions about electoral integrity.
What is the deadline for Tejashwi Yadav to respond?
Tejashwi Yadav has been given until August 16 to respond to the administration's inquiry regarding the dual EPIC numbers.
What consequences could arise from this situation?
If found to have used a forged document, Tejashwi Yadav could face legal consequences, including potential criminal charges.
What was Tejashwi Yadav's response to the allegations?
Tejashwi Yadav stated that he has not received any notice from the Election Commission and questioned the legitimacy of the complaints about the dual EPIC numbers.
