Will Isolated Pakistan Abandon Terrorism or Face Destruction?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a bold statement, VHP spokesperson Vinod Bansal warns Pakistan to renounce terrorism or face dire consequences after India’s military actions. This article dives deep into Bansal’s insights on terrorism, Pakistan's isolation, and its implications for India.
Key Takeaways
- India's military actions are a response to terrorism.
- Pakistan must abandon its support for extremist factions.
- Unity among nations is crucial to combat terrorism.
- VHP emphasizes the importance of national security.
- Internal opposition within Pakistan impacts its international standing.
New Delhi, May 8 (NationPress) Following the recent military actions by India's armed forces targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) in response to the Pahalgam terror attack, Vinod Bansal, spokesperson for the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), articulated on Thursday that Islamabad and its extremist factions must abandon terrorism or face dire consequences.
In a conversation with IANS, Bansal addressed various pressing matters, including the internal opposition Pakistan faces and the role of the Congress party in this context.
He praised India's armed forces and Prime Minister Narendra Modi for their unified efforts to combat terrorism, specifically referencing 'Operation Sindoor'.
Further elaborating, he noted that after showcasing the principle of 'Vasudhaiva Kutumbkam' to the world by supplying anti-COVID-19 vaccines during a global crisis, India is now committed to liberating the world from terrorism.
Issuing a stern warning to Pakistan, Bansal stated, "Operation Sindoor has clearly indicated that those responsible for harming our families will face retribution."
Bansal emphasized that Pakistan has become increasingly isolated and even lacks support from fellow Muslim nations, as evidenced by the Balochistan Liberation Army’s attack on Lahore.
He reiterated that India's struggle is not aimed at any particular community, nation, or religion, stating, "India does not invade other nations, as it is not part of our culture; however, our Shastras remind us that if provoked, we will retaliate."
Addressing the notion that terrorism lacks a religious identity, he argued that the Pahalgam attack contradicts such beliefs, asserting, "Individuals from a certain faith targeted Hindus and took their lives. If this is not religiously motivated, then what is?"
Bansal pointed out that the Pakistani government’s practice of draping terrorists' bodies in national flags demonstrates their complicity with these groups.
He also called for decisive action against terrorism and the integration of PoK into India.
Bansal criticized the Congress party for its support towards Pakistan, urging them to reflect on their stance.
Notably, he mentioned that Muslim leaders in India are rallying behind the government and voicing their disapproval of Pakistan, while Congress continues its unchanged narrative, according to the VHP leader.
Point of View
I stand with our nation in its pursuit of security and stability. The ongoing struggle against terrorism is a shared concern, and it's imperative that we address these threats with unity and resolve.
NationPress
23/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted VHP's statement regarding Pakistan?
The statement was prompted by India's military actions targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in response to the Pahalgam terror attack.
What is 'Operation Sindoor'?
'Operation Sindoor' refers to India's military efforts aimed at dismantling terror networks operating from Pakistan and PoK.
How has Pakistan been isolated in recent times?
Pakistan has faced increasing isolation, receiving little support from other Muslim countries and struggling with internal opposition.
What does VHP advocate for regarding terrorism?
VHP advocates for a strong stance against terrorism and the integration of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir into India.
How does the Congress party fit into this narrative?
Bansal criticized the Congress party for defending Pakistan, suggesting that they should reconsider their position in the context of rising nationalism.
