Arunachal CM Pema Khandu calls for dialogue on 11,200-MW Siang project after Pasighat violence
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu on Saturday, 24 October condemned incidents of arson, looting and vandalism in Pasighat that followed a 12-hour shutdown across three districts — Siang, Upper Siang and East Siang — called to protest the proposed Siang Upper Multipurpose Project (SUMP), a hydropower scheme with a planned generation capacity of 11,200 MW. Khandu urged all stakeholders to pursue their concerns through dialogue rather than disruption, saying the government's doors remained open for discussions on the project.
What Happened in Pasighat
The bandh, which remained largely peaceful through the day in Siang and Upper Siang districts, turned violent after it formally ended, with clashes continuing into the early hours of Saturday until around 3.30 am, according to Khandu. Mobs set fire to an office of the National Hydroelectric Power Corporation (NHPC) and a police station in East Siang district, according to a senior police official.
The residences of local MLA Oni Panyang, senior MLA Ninong Ering, and state Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) president Kaling Moyong were ransacked and looted, Khandu confirmed. The Adi Baane Kebang (ABK) complex was also among the properties damaged. Several police personnel were injured after protesters allegedly pelted them with stones in Pasighat, the district headquarters of East Siang.
According to police, over 150 protesters, reportedly armed with machetes, lathis and slingshots, attempted to vandalise police vehicles and breach barricades before hurling stones at security personnel. Clashes were also reported near Ranaghat Bridge in Mebo, where protesters allegedly threw stones at police.
The Chief Minister's Response
Addressing the media, Khandu described the incidents as 'regrettable' and called upon all sections of society to maintain peace. He underscored that while the right to peaceful protest was a cornerstone of democracy, demonstrations must remain within the bounds of the law and must not result in damage to property or disruption of public order.
'The government's doors are always open. Any organisation or association that wants to discuss the SUMP project is welcome. People should question the government, discuss the possible benefits and negative aspects of the project, and seek clarification on their concerns,' Khandu said.
The Chief Minister offered to meet representatives of organisations from the Siang region in Itanagar, Pasighat, or at any location convenient to them, and said he was willing to travel to a venue proposed by stakeholders, accompanied by relevant government departments.
Demands of the Protesting Organisations
The 12-hour shutdown was jointly called by the Adi Bane Kebang United, the SUMP Affected Area Youth Association, the Siang Indigenous Farmers' Forum Youth Wing and the Adi Galo Welfare Society. The organisations are demanding the release of 10 arrested activists, reinstatement of suspended village headmen (locally called 'Gaon Buras'), withdrawal of all pre-feasibility survey activities related to the proposed project, and removal of paramilitary and central forces deployed in the region.
The state government has clarified that activities currently under way are limited to technical and environmental surveys for preparing a pre-feasibility report (PFR) to assess the project's viability — and that no construction has been sanctioned.
Political Reactions and Background
The opposition Arunachal Pradesh Congress strongly condemned the violence but also demanded an independent inquiry into the reported use of tear gas shells against protesters during the shutdown. The party's dual condemnation — of both the arson and the alleged use of force — reflects the politically charged atmosphere surrounding the SUMP project.
Notably, the SUMP has been a flashpoint in the Siang valley for months, with indigenous communities expressing fears about displacement, ecological damage and inadequate consultation. Khandu reiterated that public consensus would remain central to the process of taking the project forward, and called for round-table discussions to address concerns and clarify doubts. How quickly those talks materialise will determine whether the standoff de-escalates or deepens.