Are Jitendra Awhad's Remarks Evidence of a Distorted Mentality?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The controversial statements made by NCP (SP) MLA Jitendra Awhad regarding Sanatan Dharma have ignited a fierce political debate. BJP and JD-U leaders have condemned his comments, sparking discussions about religious division and political motives. What does this mean for the political landscape?
Key Takeaways
- Awhad's remarks have caused political backlash
- BJP and JD-U leaders accuse him of distorting religious views
- Discussion on Sanatan Dharma's relevance continues
- Calls for respectful dialogue in politics
- Intellectual discourse in politics is crucial
New Delhi, Aug 4 (NationPress) NCP (SP) MLA Jitendra Awhad's provocative comments regarding Sanatan Dharma have sparked a significant political uproar, with leaders from BJP and JD-U sharply denouncing his remarks, labeling them as indicative of a distorted mentality. They further accused him of fomenting religious division for personal political gain.
In response to Awhad, Madhya Pradesh Minister Inder Singh Parmar remarked, “Only those with a distorted mentality can harbor such beliefs. Individuals like him need to reassess their mindset. It is due to Sanatan Dharma that they possess an identity today.”
During a media interaction on Saturday, Awhad claimed, “Sanatan Dharma has devastated India. There was never a religion known as Sanatan Dharma; we adhere to Hindu Dharma.”
BJP MLA Ram Kadam also condemned Awhad’s statements, alleging that the Sharad Pawar faction is intentionally misrepresenting Hindu beliefs for appeasement politics.
“Sanatan Dharma embodies the teaching of ‘Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah’. We regard the world as one family, prioritizing service to humanity above all. Doesn’t the Sharad Pawar faction recognize this? They wrongly associate saffron with terrorism, which is entirely misleading and a mere act of appeasement towards a specific religious group,” he stated.
JD-U's chief spokesperson Neeraj Kumar expressed disappointment, accusing Awhad of making the political discussion 'intellectually toxic'.
“I believe politics has reached a point where an atmosphere of intellectual terror prevails... Today, I learned that Hinduism is now specifically identified as Sanatan Dharma. Who holds the supreme intellectual authority here? Politicians preaching on religion should exit politics and embrace the role of spiritual leaders instead,” Kumar commented.
Despite the backlash against his contentious remarks, Dr. Awhad has remained steadfast, taking to X to assert, “Sanatan terrorism must be recognized! The existence of Sanatan terrorism is not a new issue; it has been present since ancient times.”
Point of View
It's crucial to approach the discourse around Jitendra Awhad's statements with a balanced lens. While political leaders often engage in heated rhetoric, the emphasis should be on fostering dialogue that bridges divides rather than exacerbating them. Ensuring respect for all beliefs is paramount in a diverse society like India.
NationPress
07/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Jitendra Awhad say about Sanatan Dharma?
Jitendra Awhad claimed that Sanatan Dharma has ruined India and asserted that it never existed as a religion, stating instead that followers adhere to Hindu Dharma.
How have BJP leaders responded to Awhad's comments?
BJP leaders have sharply criticized Awhad's statements, describing them as indicative of a distorted mentality and accusing him of inciting religious division for political gain.
What is the significance of Sanatan Dharma in Indian politics?
Sanatan Dharma is often viewed as a foundational aspect of Hindu identity in India, and discussions surrounding it can evoke strong political and emotional responses.
