Is There a Baseless Political Vendetta Against the Gandhis?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Congress party condemned a new FIR by the EOW accusing Rahul and Sonia Gandhi of criminal conspiracy in the National Herald case, labeling it as a baseless political vendetta aimed at undermining the Gandhi family's reputation. Key leaders have defended their actions, emphasizing the newspaper's historical significance.
Key Takeaways
- New FIR filed by EOW against Congress leaders.
- Accusations include criminal conspiracy related to National Herald.
- Congress defends actions, citing historical significance of the newspaper.
- Political analysts suggest motivations behind the timing of the FIR.
- Case reflects broader issues of political conflict in India.
New Delhi, Dec 1 (NationPress) A recent First Information Report (FIR) lodged by the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police has accused prominent Congress figures Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi of engaging in a criminal conspiracy related to the National Herald money laundering case. The Congress party has reacted strongly, labeling the accusation as “baseless” and an act of political vendetta. The FIR implicates six individuals, including the Gandhis.
In comments to IANS regarding the new FIR, Congress leader Udit Raj stated, “This FIR is completely false and baseless. The Herald newspaper was established in 1937 to support India’s freedom struggle, and it played a significant role until Independence.”
He added, “When the newspaper faced financial difficulties, the Congress provided a loan of Rs 100 crore, which was utilized to cover salaries, allowances, and pensions totaling about Rs 67 crore. No land or ownership rights were transferred to Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, or Sam Pitroda. Operating a party-affiliated newspaper in this manner does not amount to any criminal wrongdoing. If land or assets had been transferred, that would be a different issue. This is merely politics of pressure, fear, and intimidation.”
Congress MP Chamalal Kiran Kumar Reddy remarked, “The timing just before the Winter Session seems to be a deliberate attempt to distract public attention. The National Herald case has already demonstrated a lack of money laundering or financial misconduct, yet such actions persist. This clearly indicates a political vendetta intended to discredit the Gandhi family.”
CPI(M) MP P. Sandosh Kumar commented, “I cannot elaborate much, but it is evident that this appears to be part of a political vendetta against Opposition leaders.”
The FIR also names Sam Pitroda, Suman Dubey, Sunil Bhandari, and an unidentified individual, in addition to three companies: Associated Journals Limited (AJL), Young Indian, and Dotex Merchandise Private Limited. It alleges a criminal conspiracy to “fraudulently take over Associated Journals Limited (AJL)”, the parent company of the now-defunct National Herald newspaper.
According to reports, Dotex Merchandise, a company based in Kolkata, allegedly provided Rs 1 crore to Young Indian, a non-profit organization in which Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi collectively hold a 76 percent share. The allegation is that through this transaction, Young Indian paid Rs 50 lakh to the Congress and gained control of AJL, which is reported to possess assets valued at nearly Rs 2,000 crore.
The FIR, dated October 3, stems from a complaint by the Enforcement Directorate (ED), which submitted its investigative findings to the Delhi Police.
The National Herald case has its origins in 2012 when BJP leader Subramanian Swamy filed a complaint in a Delhi court, accusing Congress leaders of cheating and criminal breach of trust regarding the acquisition of AJL, which published the National Herald—founded by Jawaharlal Nehru and other freedom fighters in 1938.
The National Herald ceased publication in 2008 due to financial challenges, at which point AJL had an outstanding debt of Rs 90 crore. Over the course of a decade, the Congress provided the amount in nearly 100 installments to assist the organization.
As per Congress statements, neither AJL nor the National Herald could repay the amount, prompting the conversion of the loan into equity. Since the party cannot legally hold equity shares, they were transferred to Young Indian, incorporated in 2010 as a non-profit entity.
Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi reportedly each hold 38 percent shares in Young Indian, while the remaining shares are distributed among Motilal Vora, Oscar Fernandes, Sam Pitroda, and Suman Dubey.
Point of View
The ongoing allegations against the Gandhis highlight the contentious nature of Indian politics. While the Congress party vehemently defends its leaders, it also underscores a growing trend of using legal frameworks as tools for political warfare. As the situation unfolds, it is imperative for the public to remain informed and critically assess the narratives presented by both sides.
NationPress
01/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the National Herald case about?
The National Herald case involves allegations against Congress leaders regarding financial misconduct and criminal conspiracy related to the acquisition of Associated Journals Limited, the publisher of the now-defunct National Herald newspaper.
Why has the Congress party termed the FIR as baseless?
The Congress party argues that the FIR is politically motivated and that the actions taken by its leaders were legal and in support of a historical newspaper that played a key role in India's freedom struggle.
Who are the key figures involved in the FIR?
The FIR names Rahul Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi, Sam Pitroda, Suman Dubey, Sunil Bhandari, and an unknown individual, along with three companies including Associated Journals Limited.
What are the implications of this FIR?
The FIR could have significant political ramifications, potentially influencing public perception of the Congress party and the Gandhi family, especially with elections approaching.
What is the historical significance of the National Herald?
The National Herald was established in 1937 to support India's freedom struggle and was founded by prominent leaders including Jawaharlal Nehru.
