Puch AI Co-Founder Clarifies Funding Misconceptions: No Taxpayer Money Involved
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
New Delhi, March 24 (NationPress) In light of increased scrutiny regarding its collaboration with the Uttar Pradesh government, Puch AI co-founder Siddharth Bhatia provided a comprehensive explanation on Tuesday. He emphasized that the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) established with the state does not utilize any public funding. Instead, it aims to foster investment opportunities without relying on taxpayer resources.
In a statement shared on the social media platform X, Bhatia detailed that this partnership is structured as a public-private venture and will unfold in stages, supported by external investors.
“Our company has not received any financial aid, GPUs, or any other assistance from the government. Citizens will benefit from free access to AI services in local languages via our platform,” he noted.
This clarification arrives at a moment when the Uttar Pradesh government has reiterated that the MoU is non-binding and merely a preliminary measure.
Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath previously mentioned that such agreements do not guarantee final project endorsement and are subject to thorough evaluation.
In response to financial rumors, Bhatia addressed the inaccuracies surrounding claims that Puch AI generates revenue of Rs 42.9 lakh, clarifying that this confusion likely stems from another company.
While he stated that Puch AI's financial information is not publicly available, he characterized the startup as well-funded rather than bootstrapped.
Regarding its technology, Bhatia remarked that the company does not possess its own foundational AI model, viewing it as unnecessary at this point.
“Instead, we have constructed infrastructure utilizing open-source models tailored for Indian users, prioritizing accessibility via platforms like WhatsApp and voice interaction,” he explained.
“Our mission is to make AI accessible to millions of Indians who currently face language and usability challenges when using tools like ChatGPT or Google Gemini,” he added.
Bhatia also countered critiques that the platform functions merely as a “wrapper,” asserting that they do not depend on APIs from companies like OpenAI or Anthropic, having developed their infrastructure independently. However, he acknowledged that the interpretation of such terms can vary.