Did the Rajasthan HC Provide Relief to Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone in Defective Car Case?

Click to start listening
Did the Rajasthan HC Provide Relief to Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone in Defective Car Case?

Synopsis

Bollywood stars Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone have been granted a significant reprieve by the Rajasthan High Court, which stayed an FIR against them related to a defective Hyundai vehicle. The case raises questions about the responsibilities of brand ambassadors in product accountability.

Key Takeaways

  • Rajasthan High Court provides relief to Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone.
  • The FIR claimed actors misled consumers as Hyundai's ambassadors.
  • Legal representatives argued actors have no technical involvement in vehicle production.
  • Next court hearing set for September 25.
  • The case raises questions about brand ambassador responsibilities.

Jaipur, Sep 10 (NationPress) Bollywood stars Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone have received significant relief from the Rajasthan High Court, which has placed a hold on an FIR filed against them in Bharatpur. This legal action was initiated by a local vehicle owner who claimed that Hyundai Motors sold him a flawed car.

The FIR, which was filed recently, implicated both actors along with six company officials, alleging they misled consumers as Hyundai’s brand ambassadors. In response, Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone sought the Rajasthan High Court's intervention to dismiss the FIR against them. Their legal representatives contended that their involvement as brand ambassadors was strictly promotional and did not extend to the technical aspects of the company’s operations.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Shah Rukh Khan, argued that the actor holds no direct responsibility regarding the quality of Hyundai vehicles and it was unjust to involve him in this matter.

Advocate Madhav Mitra, who defended Deepika Padukone, mirrored these sentiments, asserting she should not be held liable for purported manufacturing flaws.

During the hearing in Jodhpur, Justice Sudesh Bansal noted that the FIR appeared to lack sufficient factual grounding. Consequently, the court issued a stay on the FIR, granting interim relief to both actors as well as the company officials involved.

The upcoming hearing is set for September 25.

This case originated from a complaint by a Bharatpur resident who accused Hyundai Motors of delivering a vehicle with significant defects, leading to financial repercussions. The FIR claimed that because Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone endorsed the brand, they too shared responsibility for misleading customers.

Nonetheless, both actors assert that such charges are not legally tenable, as endorsing a brand does not inherently imply liability for its product issues.

In the Rajasthan High Court proceedings, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal appeared on behalf of Shah Rukh Khan, while Senior Advocate Madhav Mitra represented Deepika Padukone, and Senior Advocate Vivek Raj Bajwa argued for Hyundai’s MD Anso Kim.

The bench, after reviewing the arguments, provided interim relief to all petitioners by suspending the FIR filed in Bharatpur. The petitions presented by Shah Rukh Khan, Deepika Padukone, Anso Kim, and another company official highlighted the absence of specific allegations against them.

Furthermore, the defense pointed out that the complainant, advocate Kirti Singh, had been using the car for nearly three years, covering over 67,000 kilometers. They argued that if he had legitimate concerns, he should have approached a consumer court instead of filing an FIR. The petitioners insisted that initiating a criminal case under these circumstances was not legally warranted.

Point of View

I believe this case highlights the complexities surrounding brand endorsements in today's consumer-driven society. While brand ambassadors play a crucial role in promoting products, it’s essential to delineate their legal responsibilities from those of the manufacturers. The Rajasthan High Court's ruling underscores the importance of a fair examination of such cases.
NationPress
10/09/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the reason behind the FIR against Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone?
The FIR was filed by a local car owner who alleged that Hyundai Motors sold him a defective vehicle, implicating the actors as brand ambassadors.
What did the Rajasthan High Court decide regarding the FIR?
The Rajasthan High Court stayed the FIR, providing interim relief to both Shah Rukh Khan and Deepika Padukone.
Who represented the actors in court?
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal represented Shah Rukh Khan, and Senior Advocate Madhav Mitra represented Deepika Padukone.
What is the next step in this legal matter?
The next hearing is scheduled for September 25.
What is the main argument of the actors' legal teams?
The actors' legal teams argue that as brand ambassadors, their role is limited to promoting the product and does not involve technical operations or product liability.