Shiv Sena (UBT) calls BJP's Hindutva a sham, cites Ram Mandir theft and China incursions

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Shiv Sena (UBT) calls BJP's Hindutva a sham, cites Ram Mandir theft and China incursions

Synopsis

Shiv Sena (UBT)'s 'Saamana' editorial on 1 July went beyond routine opposition rhetoric — it stitched together the Ram Mandir donations controversy and reported Chinese encroachments in Arunachal Pradesh into a single indictment of BJP's nationalist credentials, invoking Ravana to argue the party is more hypocrite than Hindu. The BJP has not yet responded.

Key Takeaways

Shiv Sena (UBT) published a scathing editorial in 'Saamana' on 1 July , calling BJP's Hindutva and patriotism a 'sham.' The party alleged that suspects in the Ram Mandir donation theft in Ayodhya enjoy BJP protection, while police focus on peripheral individuals.
The editorial cited the 'Nah' tribal community of Upper Subansiri, Arunachal Pradesh , claiming the Chinese PLA has encroached into the Taksing revenue area .
PM Narendra Modi and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh were accused of staying silent on the alleged Chinese land-grab.
The party referenced the Galwan Valley clash in which 20 Indian jawans were killed, arguing no retaliation was launched against China.
The BJP had not issued an official response at the time of publication.

Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) on Wednesday, 1 July launched a sharp broadside against the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), accusing it of practising a hollow brand of patriotism and Hindutva, through an editorial published in the party's mouthpiece 'Saamana'. The Thackeray camp invoked the figure of Ravana to argue that the BJP's Hindu credentials were performative rather than principled.

The 'Saamana' Editorial: Core Charges

The editorial drew a provocative comparison, asserting that unlike the BJP, Ravana — traditionally cast as a villain in Hindu texts — was 'not a hypocritical Hindu and did not rob the donation boxes of Ram temples.' The party argued that if citizens feel no outrage at what it described as the looting of Lord Ram, the theft of national territory, and the undermining of democracy and the Constitution, then 'even a 13th avatar of Vishnu will not be able to save this country.' The editorial characterised the current moment as the 'extreme apex of the Kali Yuga, where selfishness, immorality, and corruption have been normalised.'

Ram Mandir Donations Row

The Thackeray faction linked its critique to reports of alleged theft of gold and donations from the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, a controversy that has drawn nationwide attention. The editorial alleged that the prime suspects in the donations theft were being shielded, while police investigations have reportedly focused on peripheral individuals. The party claimed that those responsible 'enjoy the full protection of the BJP,' though it did not produce independent evidence for this assertion.

China Incursions in Arunachal Pradesh

The editorial widened its attack to encompass what it described as China's encroachment into Indian territory in Arunachal Pradesh. According to the party, the indigenous 'Nah' tribal community living along the border of Upper Subansiri district has stated that China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) has taken control of land in the Taksing revenue area of Subansiri, violating the international border. The Thackeray camp alleged that despite repeated protests by local communities, neither the Centre nor the defence establishment has responded adequately.

The editorial drew a pointed contrast: 'While Bangladeshi infiltrators is turned into a major election issue in West Bengal, China's incursions into Arunachal and Ladakh are tolerated silently. This exposes severe vulnerabilities in India's defence framework.' The party also referenced the case of activist Sonam Wangchuk, alleging that when he raised concerns about Chinese intrusion in Ladakh, the central government labelled him a traitor and detained him.

Attack on PM Modi and Defence Minister

The Thackeray-led party alleged that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh have remained silent on the reported Chinese land-grab in Arunachal, even as the Prime Minister was on a foreign tour. 'Even Defence Minister Rajnath Singh has failed to offer an official clarification on the matter,' the editorial stated. It further alleged that the BJP's daily focus on 'breaking opposition parties and poaching MLAs and MPs' — which it brands as national service — leaves no room for confronting China's territorial ambitions.

The editorial revisited the Galwan Valley clash, noting that 20 Indian jawans were killed in the confrontation with Chinese forces, yet no retaliatory operation was launched. 'Those who speak aggressively against Pakistan and Bangladesh surrender before China's military might,' the party said.

BJP Yet to Respond

As of the time of publication, the BJP had not issued an official response to the Saamana editorial. The allegations — spanning the Ram Mandir donations controversy, the Arunachal border situation, and the Galwan Valley episode — are likely to sharpen the political divide between the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) and the ruling Mahayuti alliance ahead of upcoming electoral cycles in Maharashtra.

Point of View

Shiv Sena (UBT) is attempting to neutralise the BJP on the two terrains it owns — Hindu identity and national security. The Ravana comparison is deliberately provocative, designed to generate outrage and coverage rather than theological debate. What the editorial does not do is offer verifiable evidence for its central charge that BJP is shielding the Ram Mandir theft suspects — a claim that, if substantiated, would be explosive, but as stated remains a political allegation. The silence from both PM Modi and Rajnath Singh on the Arunachal border reports, however, is a factual gap that the opposition will continue to exploit regardless of this editorial.
NationPress
1 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Shiv Sena (UBT) say about BJP's Hindutva in 'Saamana'?
Shiv Sena (UBT) called BJP's Hindutva and patriotism a 'sham' in a 1 July editorial in its mouthpiece 'Saamana,' comparing the party unfavourably to Ravana and alleging it has failed to protect either the Ram Mandir's donations or India's borders from China.
What is the Ram Mandir donation theft controversy referred to in the editorial?
The editorial referenced reports of gold and donations allegedly stolen from the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, claiming that the prime suspects enjoy BJP protection while police investigations have focused on peripheral individuals. These are allegations made by the party and have not been independently verified.
What did the Saamana editorial say about China's incursions in Arunachal Pradesh?
The editorial cited the indigenous 'Nah' tribal community of Upper Subansiri district, Arunachal Pradesh, as stating that China's PLA has encroached into the Taksing revenue area, violating the international border. It alleged that the Centre has remained silent despite repeated local protests.
Why did the editorial mention Sonam Wangchuk?
The editorial alleged that when activist Sonam Wangchuk raised concerns about Chinese intrusion in Ladakh, the central government labelled him a traitor and detained him — using this as an example of the BJP suppressing border-security concerns rather than addressing them.
Has the BJP responded to the Shiv Sena (UBT) editorial?
As of 1 July, the BJP had not issued an official response to the Saamana editorial or to the specific allegations regarding the Ram Mandir donations and the Arunachal Pradesh border situation.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 4 days ago
  2. 1 week ago
  3. 2 weeks ago
  4. 3 weeks ago
  5. 6 months ago
  6. 7 months ago
  7. 8 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google