Is the Supreme Court’s Ruling on Telangana’s Speaker a Case of Gross Contempt?

Click to start listening
Is the Supreme Court’s Ruling on Telangana’s Speaker a Case of Gross Contempt?

Synopsis

The Supreme Court's recent condemnation of Telangana's Assembly Speaker for delaying disqualification petitions ignites a political storm. With potential by-elections on the horizon, tensions rise as the Speaker faces an ultimatum from the apex court. Will he act before facing the consequences?

Key Takeaways

  • The Supreme Court has criticized the Telangana Speaker for delaying disqualification petitions.
  • The Speaker faces a decision to act or confront contempt charges.
  • The BRS party is preparing for potential by-elections.
  • Political unrest is growing in Telangana due to the Speaker's inaction.
  • Key defectors include prominent BRS MLAs who joined Congress.

New Delhi, Nov 17 (NationPress) The Supreme Court on Monday condemned the Telangana Assembly Speaker Gaddam Prasad Kumar for what it labeled as “gross contempt” due to the ongoing delay in addressing the disqualification petitions of 10 Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) MLAs who switched allegiance to the ruling Congress party.

A Bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai, along with Justices K. Vinod Chandran and N.V. Anjaria, was reviewing a contempt petition submitted by BRS leader Kaushik Reddy after the Speaker neglected to adhere to the Supreme Court’s directive issued on July 31, which mandated a decision on the disqualification petitions within a three-month timeframe.

The deadline established by the Supreme Court had lapsed on October 31.

Expressing strong disapproval of the Speaker’s inaction, the CJI Gavai-led Bench commented, “It is for him (the Speaker) to decide whether he wants to address the matter or confront contempt from this Court. This is gross contempt.”

“Resolve it by next week or face the consequences of contempt. We have already established that he does not possess constitutional immunity when deliberating on matters under the Tenth Schedule. He must choose how he wishes to spend his New Year’s Eve,” the apex court cautioned.

Representing the Speaker, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi assured the CJI Gavai-led Bench that a decision would be forthcoming within two weeks, stating, “The message is loud and clear, milord.”

The controversy originates from the defection of 10 BRS MLAs, including Danam Nagender, Kadiyam Srihari, Pocharam Srinivas Reddy, and Tellam Venkat Rao, who aligned with Congress in 2023 following its return to power in Telangana.

In an order dated July 31, the Supreme Court directed the Speaker to resolve the disqualification petitions “as expediently as possible and in any case within three months,” also nullifying a ruling from the Telangana High Court that indicated no time limit could be placed on the Speaker.

The Speaker’s persistent delay has incited political unrest within Telangana. BRS working president K.T. Rama Rao recently indicated that the party is ready to return to the Supreme Court to ensure that the defected MLAs are unseated, asserting that by-elections in the relevant constituencies have become “inevitable.”

Previously, in August, a faction of BRS MLAs even submitted a disqualification petition at the Mahatma Gandhi statue on the Assembly grounds after being unable to meet with the Telangana Assembly Speaker.

The defectors include Danam Nagender (Khairatabad constituency), Tellam Venkat Rao (Bhadrachalam), Kadiyam Srihari (Station Ghanpur), Pocharam Srinivas Reddy (Banswada), M. Sanjay Kumar (Jagtial), Arekapudi Gandhi (Serilingampally), T. Prakash Goud (Rajendranagar), B. Krishna Mohan Reddy (Gadwal), G. Mahipal Reddy (Patancheru), and Kale Yadaiah (Chevella) who transitioned to the Congress party last year.

Point of View

The Supreme Court's intervention in this political scenario highlights the judiciary's role in upholding democratic principles. As the situation develops, it's crucial for all parties involved to adhere to legal frameworks to ensure political stability in Telangana.
NationPress
17/11/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the Supreme Court's ruling regarding the Telangana Speaker?
The Supreme Court condemned the Telangana Assembly Speaker for gross contempt due to delays in ruling on disqualification petitions of 10 BRS MLAs who defected to the Congress party.
What are the implications of the Supreme Court's decision?
The implications include potential political unrest and the possibility of by-elections in the affected constituencies as BRS prepares to challenge the Speaker's inaction.
Who are the notable MLAs involved in the defection?
Notable MLAs include Danam Nagender, Kadiyam Srihari, Pocharam Srinivas Reddy, and Tellam Venkat Rao, who all switched to the Congress party in 2023.
What was the timeline set by the Supreme Court?
The Supreme Court ordered the Speaker to decide on the disqualification petitions within three months, a deadline that expired on October 31.
What are the potential consequences for the Speaker?
If the Speaker does not act promptly, he may face contempt charges from the Supreme Court, which could lead to significant political and legal repercussions.
Nation Press