Did the US Appeals Court Just Overturn Trump's Tariffs?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
A recent ruling from a federal appeals court has overturned President Trump's global reciprocal tariffs, citing lack of authority. As Trump prepares to take the matter to the Supreme Court, the implications of this decision could reshape U.S. trade policy significantly. Stay tuned as we explore what this means for the future of tariffs in America.
Key Takeaways
- A federal appeals court has invalidated Trump's reciprocal tariffs.
- The ruling emphasizes limits on presidential power regarding tariffs.
- Trump plans to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.
- Existing tariffs on steel and aluminum will not be affected.
- The ruling may reshape future U.S. trade policies.
Washington, Aug 30 (NationPress) In a significant blow to U.S. President Donald Trump, a federal appeals court has invalidated the majority of the administration’s global reciprocal tariffs. The court determined that President Trump lacked the authority to impose tariffs. Following the ruling, President Trump announced plans to escalate the matter to the Supreme Court.
The ruling stated, “The statute grants considerable power to the President to take various actions in response to a declared national emergency, but none of these actions explicitly encompass the authority to impose tariffs, duties, or taxes.”
The court did not enforce its order until October 14, providing the administration time to pursue legal options in the Supreme Court.
However, the existing U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum, which were established under a different legal framework, will remain intact.
Commenting on the President’s use of the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to implement these “reciprocal” tariffs, the court emphasized that it did not grant Trump “unlimited authority to impose tariffs.”
“The statute neither refers to tariffs nor includes procedural safeguards that clearly delineate limits on the President’s authority to impose tariffs,” the court noted in its decision.
In response to the ruling on social media, Trump declared, “ALL TARIFFS ARE STILL IN EFFECT!” He further warned that the implementation of the ruling would “literally destroy the United States of America.”
He indicated that a Supreme Court appeal is forthcoming: “Now, with the assistance of the United States Supreme Court, we will leverage them for the benefit of our Nation,” he posted on Truth Social.
Since taking office again in January, President Trump has utilized tariffs as a significant negotiating tool to extract substantial concessions from countries during trade agreements or to penalize those that do not comply.
In May, the U.S. Court of International Trade in New York also ruled against Trump, stating that the President exceeded his authority in imposing tariffs.
Point of View
My perspective is that this ruling symbolizes a crucial check on presidential power concerning trade policies. The court's decision underscores the importance of adhering to legislative boundaries set forth by Congress. The implications for our national economy and international relations are significant, and we must remain vigilant in ensuring that trade practices benefit the nation as a whole.
NationPress
30/08/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the recent ruling by the federal appeals court?
The federal appeals court struck down most of President Trump's global reciprocal tariffs, stating he lacked the authority to impose such tariffs.
What is President Trump's response to the ruling?
President Trump announced that he plans to appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court.
Will existing tariffs on steel and aluminum be affected?
No, the tariffs on steel and aluminum will remain in place as they were enacted under a different legal authority.
What does the ruling imply about presidential power?
The ruling implies that the President does not have unlimited authority to impose tariffs without explicit legislative backing.
How has Trump used tariffs in his administration?
Trump has utilized tariffs as a bargaining tool in trade negotiations and as a punitive measure against non-compliant countries.
