UP ministers fire back at Akhilesh Yadav over Ayodhya demolition criticism

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
UP ministers fire back at Akhilesh Yadav over Ayodhya demolition criticism

Synopsis

Four Uttar Pradesh ministers publicly dismissed Akhilesh Yadav's condemnation of the Ayodhya demolition drive as a 'joke' on 23 September, invoking the SP's own governance record to blunt his displacement argument. The sharp exchange signals that Ayodhya's redevelopment — and who gets credit or blame for it — will be a central flashpoint in UP's political narrative well ahead of the next election cycle.

Key Takeaways

Akhilesh Yadav alleged on 23 September that the Ayodhya demolition drive was uprooting poor residents and stripping them of their livelihoods.
Minister Om Prakash Rajbhar defended the drive as removal of illegal encroachments and asked Yadav to reflect on the SP's own tenure.
Minister Bhupendra Singh Chaudhary accused the Samajwadi Party of spreading a 'negative agenda' and attempting to divide society along caste lines.
Minister Narendra Kashyap called Yadav's Ayodhya development remarks 'a joke,' alleging the SP had fired on Karsevaks during its rule.
Minister Dayashankar Mishra 'Dayalu' said the SP had 'left Ayodhya abandoned like an orphan' and contrasted that with the current administration's transformation of the city.
The dispute centres on the pace of redevelopment in Ayodhya following the Ram Temple consecration in January 2024 .

Uttar Pradesh ministers on Wednesday, 23 September hit back sharply at Samajwadi Party (SP) president Akhilesh Yadav after he condemned the ongoing demolition drive in Ayodhya, with several BJP ministers calling his remarks about the temple city a 'joke' and accusing the SP of pursuing a 'negative agenda' to mislead the public.

What Akhilesh Yadav Said

Addressing a press conference in Lucknow on Wednesday, Akhilesh Yadav insisted the SP was not opposed to Ayodhya's development. 'I have said this before and I say it again, we can never become an obstacle in the development of Ayodhya and the development of the city of Lord Ram. When the opportunity comes to the Samajwadis, we will make Ayodhya a world-class city,' he said.

However, Yadav alleged that the demolition drive was causing mass displacement. 'What we are seeing now is that poor people are being uprooted on a large scale. Their livelihood is being taken away and they are being treated with discrimination,' he alleged.

Ministers Dismiss SP's Concerns

Uttar Pradesh Minister Om Prakash Rajbhar asked Yadav to reflect on the state of Ayodhya during SP's tenure. 'If illegal constructions have come up on the roads, efforts are being made to clear them. That is also causing them discomfort. If people are encroaching on the roads, then who will remove it?... the government's intention is to carry out development and to properly arrange paths for people,' Rajbhar said.

Minister Bhupendra Singh Chaudhary accused the SP of spreading falsehoods. 'Misleading people is the Samajwadi Party's agenda. When the party was in power, there used to be rampant corruption, land seizures, and prevalence of Mafias. Today, Akhilesh ji is doing politics through social media, and is furthering his agenda of misleading society,' Chaudhary said, adding that 'the people of Uttar Pradesh and the country know everything, and they will not allow his plan to divide society along caste lines to succeed.'

The 'Joke' Remark and Historical Barbs

Minister Narendra Kashyap was the most pointed in his rebuke. 'Whenever Akhilesh Yadav talks about Ayodhya's development, it feels like a joke to the people,' he said. Kashyap invoked a charged historical allegation, claiming that 'during the tenure of the Samajwadi Party, bullets were fired over Karsevaks who sacrificed their lives for the construction of the Ram Temple,' and contrasting that period with what he described as the transformation of Ayodhya under the Yogi Adityanath-led government.

Minister Dayashankar Mishra 'Dayalu' echoed those sentiments, questioning the SP's moral authority on the subject. 'What connection do those who fired bullets at the Ram Bhakts of Ram Mandir have with Ayodhya's development? For years, these people had left Ayodhya abandoned like an orphan... They don't like a clean and tidy Ayodhya, they don't like the clean and tidy Baba Vishwanath Corridor,' he said.

The Broader Political Context

The exchange reflects a deepening fault line in Uttar Pradesh politics over the redevelopment of Ayodhya, which has accelerated significantly since the consecration of the Ram Temple in January 2024. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led state government has framed demolitions as removal of encroachments to support urban infrastructure, while opposition parties, including the SP, have raised concerns about due process and the impact on residents whose properties lie in development corridors. This is not the first time Yadav has raised the displacement issue; BJP ministers have consistently responded by invoking the SP's own governance record in Ayodhya.

With assembly elections in Uttar Pradesh still years away, the Ayodhya narrative — its development optics, communal symbolism, and impact on local residents — is already shaping the rhetorical battlefield between the ruling BJP and the SP.

Point of View

For his part, is walking a careful line, disavowing obstruction of Ram Temple development while advocating for displaced residents — a position that could appeal to urban poor voters without alienating Hindu sentiment. What neither side is engaging with is the ground reality: how many residents have been displaced, under what legal authority, and with what compensation. That accountability gap is the real story that the political noise is drowning out.
NationPress
23 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did UP ministers criticise Akhilesh Yadav over Ayodhya?
UP ministers responded after Akhilesh Yadav condemned the ongoing demolition drive in Ayodhya on 23 September, alleging it was displacing poor residents. Ministers called his remarks a 'joke' and accused the SP of pursuing a negative agenda while deflecting accountability for its own governance record in the city.
What did Akhilesh Yadav say about the Ayodhya demolition drive?
Yadav said the SP would never obstruct Ayodhya's development and pledged to make it a world-class city if given the opportunity. However, he alleged that 'poor people are being uprooted on a large scale' and that their livelihoods were being taken away with discrimination.
Which UP ministers responded to Akhilesh Yadav?
Four ministers responded: Om Prakash Rajbhar, Bhupendra Singh Chaudhary, Narendra Kashyap, and Dayashankar Mishra 'Dayalu'. Each invoked the SP's governance record and defended the demolitions as legitimate removal of encroachments.
What is the Ayodhya demolition drive about?
The demolition drive in Ayodhya refers to the ongoing removal of structures described by the Uttar Pradesh government as illegal encroachments on roads and public land, undertaken as part of broader urban redevelopment of the city following the Ram Temple consecration in January 2024.
How does this dispute fit into UP's broader political landscape?
The exchange reflects a deepening contest between the BJP and the SP over the narrative around Ayodhya's redevelopment. With the Ram Temple consecration elevating the city's political symbolism, both parties are positioning themselves on development, displacement, and Hindu sentiment ahead of future electoral cycles in Uttar Pradesh.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 8 months ago
  8. 11 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google