Chris Brown ordered to pay $13 million after dog mauls housekeeper
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Chris Brown, the Grammy-winning singer-songwriter, has been ordered by a Los Angeles jury to pay nearly $13 million in damages to his former housekeeper Maria Avila, who was severely mauled by his dog at his Tarzana, California home in 2020. The verdict, delivered following a two-week civil trial, holds Brown and his company Black Pyramid LLC liable for negligence.
What Happened in the Attack
According to trial testimony, Maria Avila was taking out the trash at Brown's Tarzana property in 2020 when she was attacked by Hades, a 90kg Caucasian shepherd that Brown kept for security purposes. The dog reportedly ripped out 'large chunks of her skin,' leaving her face and arm permanently disfigured. Avila has also suffered lasting mobility issues as a result of the attack.
Damages Awarded by the Jury
The jury ruled that Brown and Black Pyramid LLC must pay Avila $12.9 million for negligence. Her sister, Patricia, who was also present and working at the time of the attack, was separately awarded $885,000. Avila's husband, Oscar Olivo, received $50,000. The combined damages across all three plaintiffs exceed $13.8 million.
Brown's Testimony and Defence
During the trial, Brown acknowledged finding Avila covered in blood but said 'The blood kind of freaked me out,' adding that he was 'in shock' when he left the scene on his manager's advice. He explained he feared his presence would create a 'media circus' if his voice appeared on the 911 call or if police found him there. Brown also claimed he had warned Avila and her sister not to go near the dogs, describing them as 'absolutely not' friendly.
The Dispute Over the Warning
Avila and her sister disputed Brown's account, stating the alleged warning never took place. They also highlighted a language barrier as making such a conversation unlikely. Brown maintained he kept the dog because he frequently encounters 'stalker-type situations' that necessitate heightened personal security.
What This Verdict Means
The ruling is one of the more significant civil judgments against Brown in recent years and raises broader questions about the legal responsibilities of high-profile individuals who keep large, potentially dangerous animals on residential properties staffed by domestic workers. The verdict is final pending any appeal by Brown or Black Pyramid LLC. Legal observers will watch whether Brown contests the award or settles the matter out of court.