Should the Government Take Action Against Priyanka, Ranveer & Radhika as Gehana Vasisth Suggests?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a bold move, actress Gehana Vasisth calls for the government to take action against Bollywood stars Priyanka Chopra, Ranveer Singh, and Radhika Apte over explicit content. With significant public attention on this issue, Gehana highlights a perceived hypocrisy in how different individuals face scrutiny for their on-screen portrayals. What will be the government's response?
Key Takeaways
- Gehana Vasisth is calling for legal action against prominent Bollywood actors.
- The demand highlights issues of hypocrisy in media accountability.
- There are calls for censorship in the digital space.
- The NCW is involved, summoning key figures from the controversy.
- This situation may set a precedent for how explicit content is treated in India.
Mumbai, May 3 (NationPress) Actress Gehana Vasisth, a participant in the reality series "House Arrest" hosted by Ajaz Khan, has called on the government to initiate legal action against Priyanka Chopra, Ranveer Singh, and Radhika Apte for their explicit portrayals on screen.
In a video message, Gehana stated, "I urge everyone, particularly Priyanka Chaturvedi and Chitra Wagh, to ensure equality in legal consequences. Just as you pursued a case against Ajaz Khan, the Ullu app, and the producers of "House Arrest", I ask you to similarly address the actions of Priyanka Chopra, Radhika Apte, and Ranveer Singh."
"They are citizens of our esteemed nation and share responsibility for their public displays. With millions of fans, especially youth, admiring them, I ask that you take my plea seriously," she continued.
Highlighting perceived hypocrisy, Gehana questioned the lack of repercussions for individuals who view adult content online.
She remarked, "If Priyanka Chopra can perform nude scenes in Hollywood or Radhika Apte can appear topless in "Sacred Games" and "Parched", or if Mandakini did bold scenes in the past (like in Ram Teri Ganga Maili), why are they not held accountable for promoting obscenity?"
Gehana further advocated for digital censorship to ensure that content creators adhere to guidelines.
A significant controversy arose after a clip from "House Arrest" circulated on social media, featuring host Ajaz Khan prompting contestants to act out sexual positions on camera.
Gehana mentioned that during the task, the greatest exposure was in a bikini, and all contestants wore additional clothing.
Following the video, the National Commission for Women (NCW) summoned Ajaz Khan and Vibhu Agarwal, CEO of the Ullu App. The Ullu app has yet to respond to the unfolding situation.
Point of View
I recognize the importance of addressing concerns surrounding explicit content in media. Gehana Vasisth's plea for equality in legal actions raises pertinent questions about accountability in the entertainment industry. It's vital to balance freedom of expression with societal values, ensuring that all public figures are treated with fairness under the law.
NationPress
25/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted Gehana Vasisth's request for legal action?
Gehana Vasisth urged the government to file a case against Priyanka Chopra, Ranveer Singh, and Radhika Apte for their explicit on-screen content, calling for equal treatment in legal standards.
What specific actions did Gehana Vasisth suggest?
She suggested that the government should take action similar to the cases filed against Ajaz Khan and the Ullu app, holding all celebrities accountable for their public displays.
What are the implications of her request?
Gehana's request raises questions about censorship in digital media and the responsibilities of public figures in presenting their content.
How has the National Commission for Women responded?
The NCW has summoned Ajaz Khan and the CEO of Ullu App for questioning following the controversy surrounding the reality show.
What was the controversy related to the 'House Arrest' show?
A clip from 'House Arrest' went viral where Ajaz Khan asked contestants to enact sexual positions, prompting public outcry.
