Will the Kerala HC Decide on the 'Haal' Film Certification Appeal?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
On November 27, 2023, the Kerala High Court reserved its verdict on an appeal from the Catholic Congress against the CBFC's A-certificate for 'Haal'. This case raises critical questions about the portrayal of religion in cinema and the boundaries of artistic expression.
Key Takeaways
- The Kerala HC is set to rule on a significant appeal regarding the film 'Haal'.
- The Catholic Congress argues that the film misrepresents religious figures.
- Key excisions sought include scenes that may hurt religious sentiments.
- The case highlights the balance between artistic freedom and religious respect.
- The verdict is expected shortly, with implications for future films.
Kochi, Nov 27 (NationPress) The Kerala High Court has reserved its decision regarding an appeal brought forth by the Catholic Congress, which contests a ruling by a Single Judge that instructed the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to reconsider the A-certificate given to the Malayalam film 'Haal' without implementing certain recommended cuts.
The Catholic Congress contended that the film misrepresents the Bishop as endorsing interfaith marriages, which contradicts his publicly stated views. They also raised concerns about visuals depicting the Bishop's residence being used without permission.
The appeal sought the restoration of Excision 2 to 4 as suggested by the CBFC.
Excision 2 involved removing a police interrogation scene featuring schoolboys over accusations of negative stereotypes against religious communities.
Excision 3 pertained to scenes that allegedly offend Christian beliefs, requiring a blurring of a Christian institution and obtaining consent for filming at the Bishop's residence.
Excision 4 called for alterations to scenes portraying police and state officials unfavorably, particularly regarding their treatment of religious groups.
A Division Bench, including Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice P.V. Balakrishnan, raised questions about the appeal's validity, suggesting that the Catholic Congress, as a respondent in the original case, may lack the legal standing to pursue relief.
The bench remarked, 'You are not the petitioner. You can't get any relief. You have to file another writ petition.'
Advocate Shinu J. Pillai, representing the Catholic Congress, maintained that the appeal was legitimate under Section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act, given that the Single Judge treated the case as a writ petition under Article 226.
The counsel argued that the filmmakers had depicted the Bishop's premises without ecclesiastical approval and misrepresented his actual position.
Senior Counsel defending the filmmakers countered that the Bishop was depicted as encouraging individuals to adhere to their faith, rather than supporting interfaith marriages.
The Court refrained from commenting on the film without viewing it and declined to halt the certification process, stating that no certificate had been issued yet.
A ruling is anticipated within the coming days.
This case highlights the sensitive interplay between religious sentiments, artistic freedom, and freedom of expression.
Point of View
It is vital to recognize the delicate balance this case strikes between artistic freedom and respect for religious sentiments. The Kerala High Court's forthcoming decision could set a precedent for how films engage with sensitive topics, reflecting the need for creative liberty while acknowledging the perspectives of various communities.
NationPress
27/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main issue in the Kerala HC appeal?
The main issue is the Catholic Congress's challenge against the CBFC's decision to certify the film 'Haal' without enforcing recommended cuts that they argue misrepresent religious sentiments.
What are the proposed excisions the Catholic Congress seeks?
The Catholic Congress seeks the reinstatement of excisions related to negative portrayals of religious communities and the depiction of the Bishop's residence without consent.
What does the court's reserved verdict mean?
A reserved verdict means the court has not yet made a decision and will deliver its judgment at a later date, which is expected soon.
How does this case affect freedom of expression?
This case highlights the tensions between artistic expression and the need to respect religious sentiments, raising questions about the boundaries of creative freedom.
What is the significance of the Bishop's portrayal in 'Haal'?
The portrayal of the Bishop is significant as it raises concerns about religious representation and the potential impact on viewers' perceptions of interfaith relationships.
