Will Jacqueline Fernandez Find Relief from the SC in the Rs 200 Crore Money Laundering Case?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Supreme Court's decision regarding Jacqueline Fernandez's plea has left the actress without relief in a significant fraud case. As the legal battle unfolds, the implications of the ruling could have far-reaching effects on her career. Stay tuned as we delve into the details surrounding this high-profile case.
Key Takeaways
- The Supreme Court denied relief to Jacqueline Fernandez in her legal battle.
- Jacqueline claims she is a victim in the fraud case.
- The ED alleges she received luxury gifts from Sukesh.
- The Delhi High Court previously upheld the validity of the charges.
- The case highlights the complexities of celebrity involvement in legal issues.
Mumbai, Sep 22 (NationPress) The Supreme Court of India has denied any relief to actress Jacqueline Fernandez by dismissing her petition related to the Rs 200 crore fraud case involving conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar.
Jacqueline had contested the Delhi High Court's ruling in the Supreme Court. On July 3, the Delhi High Court turned down the 'Murder 2' actress's request to quash the FIR filed against her by the ED for money laundering.
Reports indicate that she argued in her petition that the evidence provided by the ED purportedly illustrated that she fell victim to Sukesh’s targeted schemes.
The petition reportedly highlighted that the ED acknowledged Tihar jail officials allowed Sukesh access to mobile phones and other electronic devices, which he allegedly used to deceive the original complainant and several figures in the film industry, including Fernandez.
Furthermore, the petition asserted that since Jacqueline is a prosecution witness in the underlying offense, any further actions against her should be dismissed.
In its response, the Delhi High Court remarked that the assessment of the accused's guilt can only occur during the hearings in the lower court. Additionally, Jacqueline had claimed in the Delhi High Court that all charges against her are unfounded and that she was unaware of Sukesh's criminal history.
The ED has accused Jacqueline of allegedly accepting luxury gifts valued at around Rs 7 crore from Sukesh. However, she has repeatedly asserted that she was unaware of his criminal activities.
Earlier, the Delhi High Court also declined to quash the case, stating that the issues surrounding Jacqueline's intent and awareness of the crime need to be scrutinized during the trial.
For those unfamiliar, the Delhi Police charged Sukesh for allegedly defrauding the spouses of former Ranbaxy promoters, Shivinder Singh and Malvinder Singh, of Rs 200 crore.
Point of View
It is essential to provide an unbiased perspective on this unfolding legal drama. The Supreme Court's refusal to grant Jacqueline Fernandez relief reflects the seriousness of the allegations against her. While she claims innocence, the legal process must take its course to ensure justice is served, regardless of the individual involved.
NationPress
22/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What was Jacqueline Fernandez's petition about?
Jacqueline Fernandez's petition was aimed at quashing the FIR lodged against her by the ED in a Rs 200 crore money laundering case linked to Sukesh Chandrasekhar.
What did the Supreme Court decide?
The Supreme Court dismissed Jacqueline's petition, offering no relief in the ongoing case.
What were the claims made in Jacqueline's petition?
Jacqueline claimed she was a victim of Sukesh's schemes and pointed out that she was a prosecution witness, which should dismiss further proceedings against her.
What accusations has the ED made against Jacqueline?
The ED has accused Jacqueline of accepting luxury gifts worth approximately Rs 7 crore from Sukesh Chandrasekhar.
What was the outcome of the Delhi High Court ruling?
The Delhi High Court had previously rejected Jacqueline's request to quash the case, asserting that questions regarding her intent must be examined during the trial.
