Why Is Rajkummar Rao Speaking Up About Hindi Film Actors' Silence on the Hindi-Marathi Controversy?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a thought-provoking dialogue, Rajkummar Rao challenges the notion that silence from actors equates to apathy regarding social issues, particularly the Hindi-Marathi language debate in Maharashtra. He emphasizes the importance of personal sentiment over social media pressure, advocating for genuine expression over obligatory commentary.
Key Takeaways
- Rajkummar Rao emphasizes authentic expression over social media pressure.
- Silence does not imply indifference towards societal issues.
- Public figures have the right to choose when and how to voice their opinions.
- Emotional sensitivity is critical, especially concerning tragic events.
- Social media should not dictate emotional engagement.
Mumbai, July 6 (NationPress) Actor Rajkummar Rao has shed light on the ongoing discussion regarding the Hindi-Marathi language issue in Maharashtra, as well as the notable silence among Hindi film actors regarding such crucial matters.
In a recent interview with IANS, the 'Stree' star articulated his perspective on why not all actors feel compelled to speak publicly on every issue and emphasized that silence does not equate to apathy. When questioned whether Bollywood figures avoid commenting on the Hindi-Marathi debate and other controversial topics to maintain political correctness, Rao replied that individuals should express their thoughts on issues they genuinely care about, but not out of obligation.
He elaborated that while actors are significantly impacted by societal issues, the expectation to voice those feelings publicly—particularly on social media—can be misconstrued. Rajkummar Rao stated, “If there’s an issue you feel passionate about, you should certainly discuss it. However, it isn’t essential to comment on every single matter. Just because you don’t post about something online doesn’t mean you lack concern for it. That notion is quite peculiar. I have a deep love for my country.”
“Beyond just my national pride, whenever something tragic occurs, I feel a profound sadness. As actors, we are notably sensitive individuals. I experience deep sorrow. But if I choose not to share that on social media, it’s mistakenly assumed that I didn’t feel anything. Since when did social media become the yardstick for gauging whether someone cares? If you share, it indicates concern, and if you don’t, it suggests indifference? Who made those rules? There are countless individuals in this country and around the globe who aren't active on social platforms—do they not feel empathy? They do. Don’t they experience joy when positive events happen? Absolutely.”
Drawing from personal experiences, the 'Srikanth' actor recounted how deeply troubled he was by images of a recent airplane crash during his shooting schedule, expressing that he wept upon seeing them, yet refrained from sharing those emotions online.
“I was moved to tears by the airplane crash reports. We were filming at the time it occurred. But is it really necessary to broadcast on social media that I cried over it? No, those are personal emotions that one may or may not have. Overemphasizing social media could detract from the genuine sensitivity of the situation.”
In recent news, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) leader Raj Thackeray and Uddhav Thackeray have opposed the proposal to introduce Hindi as a third language in Marathi-medium and other public schools. Recently, the Maharashtra government had suggested Hindi as an optional third language in state schools.
Point of View
I believe that the dialogue initiated by Rajkummar Rao is crucial in a multicultural society like India. The expectation for public figures to continuously comment on every issue can dilute the authenticity of their sentiments. It’s vital to respect personal emotions and understand that not everyone expresses their feelings in the same way. This approach fosters a more inclusive conversation around sensitive matters like the Hindi-Marathi language issue.
NationPress
20/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did Rajkummar Rao speak about the Hindi-Marathi issue?
Rajkummar Rao addressed the Hindi-Marathi language issue to highlight the importance of genuine emotional expression amid societal pressures on public figures.
What did Rajkummar Rao say about silence and indifference?
He stated that silence does not equate to indifference and that individuals should speak on issues they feel passionately about without feeling obligated.
How does Rajkummar Rao view social media's role in expressing emotions?
Rao believes social media should not be the sole platform to gauge someone's concern or emotional response to events.
What recent controversy is associated with the Hindi-Marathi issue?
The Maharashtra Navnirman Sena leaders oppose the inclusion of Hindi as a third language in state-run Marathi-medium schools.
How does Rajkummar Rao feel about expressing personal emotions?
He values personal feelings over public displays on social media, emphasizing the significance of authentic emotional responses.
