Rebel Wilson wins second lawsuit, defeats A.I Film in NSW Supreme Court

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Rebel Wilson wins second lawsuit, defeats A.I Film in NSW Supreme Court

Synopsis

Rebel Wilson has now won two consecutive lawsuits — first in Australia's Federal Court against Charlotte MacInnes, and now in the NSW Supreme Court against A.I Film, backed by billionaire Len Blavatnik's Access Industries. Her Instagram post alleging a paid PR campaign to damage her reputation since July 2024 may be the most explosive detail to emerge from the case.

Key Takeaways

Rebel Wilson won her second consecutive lawsuit on 23 October 2026 , with the Supreme Court of New South Wales ruling in her favour against A.I Film .
A.I Film is wholly owned and financed by billionaire Len Blavatnik's Access Industries ; its CEO is Amanda Ghost .
Wilson's first win came earlier in the Federal Court against Charlotte MacInnes .
Wilson alleged that US discovery proceedings revealed the opposing side paid two crisis PR firms — Hiltzik Strategies and Hawthorne Advisors — to place negative stories about her from July 2024 .
The dispute centres on concerns Wilson said she raised about her film 'The Deb' .

Actor-filmmaker Rebel Wilson has secured a second consecutive legal victory, with the Supreme Court of New South Wales ruling in her favour in proceedings brought against her by A.I Film — a company whose CEO is Amanda Ghost and which is wholly owned and financed by billionaire Len Blavatnik's Access Industries. The ruling follows an earlier win in the Federal Court against Charlotte MacInnes, cementing what Wilson has called a 'David and Goliath' fight against opponents with vastly superior resources.

Wilson Speaks Out on the Verdict

Wilson announced the outcome in a detailed post on Instagram, describing the win as the culmination of an ordeal that had exacted an enormous personal, emotional and financial toll. 'Two lawsuits. Two wins. Today, the Supreme Court of New South Wales ruled in my favor in the proceedings brought against me by A.I Film,' she wrote, adding that she thanked Justice Peden for her 'careful consideration' of the case.

Wilson also acknowledged her legal team — Dauid Sibtain SC, Tim Senior, Conor O'Beirne, Sylvia Alcarraz, and the wider team at Dentons — for their dedication throughout the proceedings.

The Background: Concerns Over 'The Deb'

At the heart of the dispute, according to Wilson, were serious concerns she said she felt compelled to raise about her film 'The Deb'. 'I spoke up because I believed there were serious concerns that needed to be raised on my film The Deb,' she said. The nature of those concerns has not been detailed publicly, but Wilson has consistently maintained that she acted to protect both herself and others.

The case pitted Wilson against A.I Film, backed by Blavatnik's Access Industries — an arrangement Wilson characterised as a significant imbalance of resources between the parties.

Alleged PR Campaign to Damage Her Reputation

Wilson revealed that discovery proceedings in the United States had, she said, uncovered evidence that those suing her had been paying two crisis PR firms — Hiltzik Strategies and Hawthorne Advisors — to place negative stories about her in the media, allegedly from as far back as July 2024. 'There has been a huge imbalance of resources between the parties,' she wrote, framing the litigation as a sustained campaign to 'ruin my reputation and intentionally cause me harm.'

Wilson noted that despite the pressure, she chose to 'stay the course and stay positive,' and urged others in similar situations not to be deterred. 'I want anyone who is frightened of speaking up to know that I understand how hard it can be, especially when the people you are challenging have far greater resources,' she said.

Personal Toll and What Comes Next

Wilson acknowledged the sustained personal strain of the litigation, saying there were 'times when I've wondered how much more I could take,' before adding that she remained proud of persevering. She expressed gratitude to supporters and referenced her 'two beautiful daughters' as a source of strength during what she described as 'rough times.'

With both lawsuits now resolved in her favour, attention will turn to whether any further legal proceedings arise from the US discovery material Wilson referenced, and whether A.I Film or Access Industries respond publicly to the ruling.

Point of View

But her allegation of a sustained paid PR operation against her — reportedly dating back to July 2024 — is the detail that deserves scrutiny beyond the courtroom outcome. If borne out, it would represent a coordinated reputational assault by a well-resourced corporate entity against an individual who raised concerns about a creative project she was involved in. The power asymmetry here is real: Access Industries is a global investment behemoth, and Wilson is a single individual funding her own defence. That she prevailed twice raises questions about how many others in the entertainment industry face similar pressure without the public platform or financial resilience to fight back.
NationPress
23 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the Rebel Wilson NSW Supreme Court case about?
The Supreme Court of New South Wales ruled in Rebel Wilson's favour in proceedings brought against her by A.I Film, a company backed by billionaire Len Blavatnik's Access Industries. Wilson had raised concerns about her film 'The Deb', and the case centred on the fallout from those concerns.
How many lawsuits has Rebel Wilson now won?
Rebel Wilson has won two consecutive lawsuits. Her first victory came in the Federal Court against Charlotte MacInnes; her second, announced on 23 October 2026, came from the Supreme Court of New South Wales against A.I Film.
Who is behind A.I Film, the company that sued Rebel Wilson?
A.I Film is wholly owned and financed by billionaire Len Blavatnik's Access Industries, one of the world's largest private investment firms. Its CEO is Amanda Ghost.
What did Rebel Wilson allege about a PR campaign against her?
Wilson said that US discovery proceedings revealed the parties suing her had been paying two crisis PR firms — Hiltzik Strategies and Hawthorne Advisors — to plant negative stories about her in the media, reportedly from as far back as July 2024, with the alleged aim of damaging her reputation.
Who were Rebel Wilson's lawyers in the NSW Supreme Court case?
Wilson's legal team comprised Dauid Sibtain SC, Tim Senior, Conor O'Beirne, Sylvia Alcarraz, and the wider team at Dentons. She thanked all of them publicly in her Instagram post following the ruling.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 weeks ago
  2. 4 months ago
  3. 4 months ago
  4. 4 months ago
  5. 6 months ago
  6. 6 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google