Upasana Singh alleges Poonam Dhillon, Padmini Kolhapure broke CINTAA's ₹90 lakh FDs

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Upasana Singh alleges Poonam Dhillon, Padmini Kolhapure broke CINTAA's ₹90 lakh FDs

Synopsis

Upasana Singh has accused Poonam Dhillon, Padmini Kolhapure, and others of allegedly breaking CINTAA's frozen fixed deposits worth around ₹90 lakh without member consent or a court order — claiming office staff helped them bypass the freeze via a KYC process. Neither accused has responded, and the exact scale of transfers remains unclear.

Key Takeaways

Upasana Singh has alleged that CINTAA's fixed deposits worth around ₹90 lakh were broken without authorisation.
She named Poonam Dhillon , Padmini Kolhapure , and Paintal as individuals who allegedly accessed the frozen accounts.
Upasana claims accounts across five banks were instructed to remain frozen until a court order confirmed the new committee's authority.
She alleged that office staff facilitated the bank account reopening via a KYC process using the association's stamp and email ID.
The exact number of FDs broken is not yet confirmed; the transferred funds were allegedly used across different places.
As of 1 October 2026 , neither Poonam Dhillon nor Padmini Kolhapure had issued a response.

Actor and former office-bearer Upasana Singh has levelled serious allegations against fellow actors Poonam Dhillon and Padmini Kolhapure, claiming they were involved in the unauthorised breaking of fixed deposits belonging to the Cine and Television Artistes' Association (CINTAA) — reportedly worth around ₹90 lakh. The allegations, made on 1 October 2026 in Mumbai, mark a sharp escalation in an ongoing leadership dispute within the prominent industry body.

The Allegation: Frozen Accounts Allegedly Accessed

According to Upasana, CINTAA holds fixed deposits and bank accounts across five banks. She claimed that when the previous committee was dissolved, all five banks were formally notified and the accounts were requested to remain frozen until a new committee was legally constituted and a court order confirmed its authority to operate them.

'We have FDs in five banks and accounts in five banks. When our committee was dissolved, Deepak Parashar was the treasurer. So, we informed all the banks that the committee had been dissolved. We told them that when a new committee comes, whoever takes charge, the accounts can be opened. Until then, they should remain frozen,' Upasana alleged.

How the Accounts Were Allegedly Reopened

Upasana alleged that despite the freeze, one of the accounts was accessed — and that the FD money was subsequently transferred into a separate personal account. She alleged that office staff played a facilitating role by accompanying the accused to the bank and using the association's stamp, email ID, and office address to complete a KYC verification process.

'They must have needed an authorised signature. But you see, the account was frozen. So what did they do? They met the office staff. The office staff is involved with them. They took the staff to the bank and showed them the stamp, the email ID and the office, and asked them to open the account through KYC,' she alleged.

Upasana specifically named Poonam Dhillon, Padmini Kolhapure, and Paintal as individuals who allegedly presented themselves at the bank. 'They took Paintal saab, Poonam and Padmini and told the bank, 'This is our stamp, this is our email ID and this is our office. You open our account through KYC,' she claimed.

Key Concern: Authorisation and Committee Status

Central to Upasana's allegations is the question of whether those who accessed the accounts held legitimate authority at the time. She alleged that the individuals in question declared themselves as the committee despite, in her view, not holding valid positions. 'When you are not holding any position and you are not the general secretary, how can you say that you are the general secretary? They declared themselves as the committee,' she alleged.

She further questioned the procedural propriety of breaking institutional FDs without membership consent. 'It is such a big issue because if you want to break the FDs of any institution, you have to ask the members first. How can they break the FDs?' she said.

Extent of Transfers Still Unclear

Upasana stated that the precise number of FDs broken remained unknown. 'The money was transferred in different ways. We don't know how many FDs have been broken because we have around ₹90 lakh there,' she said. She added that the transferred funds had reportedly been used across different places, though specifics were not disclosed.

No Response Yet from Dhillon or Kolhapure

As of the time of reporting, neither Poonam Dhillon nor Padmini Kolhapure had responded to the allegations. The wider CINTAA leadership dispute, within which these allegations sit, continues to unfold, with the outcome likely to have significant implications for the association's governance and the security of its financial assets. Legal and institutional responses are expected in the coming days.

Point of View

If substantiated, could expose those involved to serious liability. What is striking is the granularity of Upasana's account: she describes a specific KYC workaround using office staff, stamps, and email IDs, which suggests either a detailed paper trail exists or a very particular sequence of events is being constructed. The fact that neither Dhillon nor Kolhapure has responded yet leaves a critical gap. Film industry bodies have long operated with opaque financial governance; if these allegations are verified, it may prompt a broader reckoning over how CINTAA — and similar associations — safeguard member funds during leadership transitions.
NationPress
1 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What has Upasana Singh alleged against Poonam Dhillon and Padmini Kolhapure?
Upasana Singh has alleged that Poonam Dhillon and Padmini Kolhapure were involved in breaking CINTAA's frozen fixed deposits — reportedly worth around ₹90 lakh — without member consent or a valid court order. She claims they accessed the accounts by presenting the association's stamp, email ID, and office details to the bank via a KYC process, assisted by office staff.
What is CINTAA and why are its accounts disputed?
CINTAA, the Cine and Television Artistes' Association, is a prominent body representing film and TV actors in India. Its accounts became disputed after the previous committee was dissolved and a leadership conflict arose over which group had the legitimate authority to operate the association's bank accounts and fixed deposits.
How much money is reportedly involved in the CINTAA FD dispute?
According to Upasana Singh, CINTAA holds around ₹90 lakh in fixed deposits across five banks. She stated that the exact number of FDs broken is not yet known, and that the transferred funds were reportedly used across different places.
Have Poonam Dhillon and Padmini Kolhapure responded to the allegations?
As of 1 October 2026, neither Poonam Dhillon nor Padmini Kolhapure had publicly responded to Upasana Singh's allegations. NationPress has not received any statement from either actor.
What happens next in the CINTAA dispute?
The allegations are part of a broader, ongoing leadership dispute within CINTAA. Upasana Singh has indicated that the committee intended to wait for a formal court order before operating the accounts, suggesting legal proceedings are either underway or imminent. Further institutional and possibly legal responses are expected in the coming days.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 41 min ago
  2. 2 weeks ago
  3. 2 weeks ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 1 month ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 1 month ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google