Lebanese President Aoun calls for alternative force if UNIFIL withdraws
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun on Friday, 25 July 2025, called for the establishment of an alternative international force to support the Lebanese army in the country's south, should the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) be unable to continue its mission. The statement came during Aoun's meeting with European Union Ambassador to Lebanon, Sandra De Waele, in Beirut.
What Aoun Said
'Lebanon considers the continued presence of the international forces in the south to be the best option for the next phase. If that proves impossible because of procedures required at the UN Security Council, an alternative international force should be established to replace them,' the Lebanese presidency quoted Aoun as saying.
Aoun said such a replacement force would assist the Lebanese army in clearing southern areas of unexploded ordnance and support the implementation of the US-brokered framework agreement signed between Lebanon and Israel in June 2025.
EU Ambassador's Position
Ambassador De Waele said Lebanon stands at a crossroads, with its future dependent on stronger security, rebuilt institutions, and structural reform. She added that reaching an agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) would unlock international funding and help attract foreign investment — a signal that Beirut's security posture is directly tied to its economic recovery prospects.
Parliament Backs UNIFIL Renewal
In a parallel development, a delegation of Lebanese lawmakers on Thursday delivered a letter — signed by 86 parliament members — to UN Special Coordinator for Lebanon Jean Arnault, urging the renewal and continued presence of UNIFIL. The letter was handed over in Beirut as part of a parliamentary initiative backing the mission.
According to Lebanon's official National News Agency (NNA), the lawmakers described the broad cross-party support as reflecting a national consensus on the importance of maintaining UNIFIL's presence in southern Lebanon. They cited the force's role in preserving security and stability, monitoring the implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, and helping prevent further escalation.
Why the Stakes Are High
The delegation argued that the conditions that originally led to UNIFIL's establishment remain in place, pointing to continuing ceasefire violations and a fragile security situation along the Lebanon-Israel border. Lawmakers called for the peacekeeping force to retain its full operational mandate, particularly during what they described as a critical period for Lebanon and the wider region.
This comes amid ongoing international debate over UNIFIL's mandate renewal at the UN Security Council, where procedural disagreements could complicate the mission's continuation. The outcome will have direct implications for southern Lebanon's stability and for the broader implementation of the June ceasefire framework.