How is China Pressing for Recognition and Compliance under the 'One China Policy'?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant shift, China's 'One China' policy is evolving from a diplomatic guideline into a powerful tool for reshaping global norms. This report examines how nations navigate this complex landscape, with India standing firm in its position. Discover the geopolitical implications and the stakes involved.
Key Takeaways
- China's 'One China' policy has evolved from a diplomatic guideline to a tool for global influence.
- Countries face pressure to align with China's position for market access.
- India maintains its position while refusing to compromise its sovereignty.
- Examples from Lithuania and the Czech Republic illustrate the consequences of non-compliance.
- Recognition does not imply subordination, as highlighted by India's stance.
Taipei, Sep 1 (NationPress) Beijing's One China policy has transcended a mere diplomatic guideline, evolving into a mechanism aimed at redefining the core principles of globalisation. A report released on Monday indicates that China is pursuing not only recognition but also strict adherence to its own regulations.
As reported by the Taipei Times, during a recent official visit to New Delhi, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi stated that India acknowledges Taiwan as a part of China.
In response, New Delhi has clarified that its stance remains unchanged, emphasizing that India, akin to multiple other nations, maintains economic, technological, and cultural interactions with Taiwan.
“India continues to recognize Beijing as the governing body of China, in line with the policy established in 1949. Furthermore, it categorically rejected the broader interpretation that Beijing attempts to impose on the One China concept. By highlighting that even Beijing engages with Taipei in similar sectors, New Delhi has shed light on the overreach of China's narrative. The distinction is clear: recognition does not imply subjugation,” stated Lin Hsiao-chen, an Assistant Professor at Tamkang University’s Graduate Institute of International Affairs and Strategic Studies, in the Taipei Times.
“China's strategy has gradually yet intentionally unfolded. What initially was a matter of representation has morphed into conditions tied to market access. Nations aspiring for deeper economic relations with China are increasingly compelled to align with Beijing's stance on Taiwan as a prerequisite,” he further explained.
The report highlighted Lithuania's experience, which faced retaliatory trade measures after permitting a Taiwanese representative office to operate under the name “Taiwan,” illustrating the punitive aspect of this strategy.
Moreover, the Czech Republic encountered threats of diminished business prospects following high-level interactions with Taipei, while several African nations were cautioned about reduced financing and infrastructure assistance if they accepted Taiwanese aid or hosted official delegations.
These instances collectively demonstrate how One China has evolved from a diplomatic acknowledgment to a means of structural leverage, compelling nations to recalibrate their foreign policies to gain access to the Chinese market.
The transition has been subtle rather than confrontational. Over time, One China has shifted from being a diplomatic principle to a necessity for market entry and now operates as a tool for influencing international standards. The result, as noted, is a super One China that asserts not just sovereign acknowledgment but also Beijing's authority to dictate the parameters of international engagement.
“In this context, India's intervention holds even greater importance. The contention over Wang's assertion was not merely about wording but about authority in rule-making. India has drawn a decisive boundary, continuing to uphold its 1949 recognition of the PRC while refusing to compromise its strategic independence by endorsing Beijing's expanded interpretation of One China,” the report concluded.
Point of View
It is crucial to underline that nations must carefully navigate the complexities of China's 'One China' policy. While economic ties are vital, countries should not forfeit their sovereignty or strategic independence. India's firm stance serves as a vital reminder of the importance of maintaining a balanced approach in international relations.
NationPress
01/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is China's 'One China' policy?
China's 'One China' policy asserts that there is only one sovereign state under the name China, which includes Taiwan. It seeks to unify Taiwan with the mainland and requires other nations to recognize this stance.
How has the 'One China' policy evolved?
Originally a diplomatic principle, the 'One China' policy has evolved into a prerequisite for market access and a tool for influencing international norms, compelling nations to align their foreign policies with China's position.
What implications does this have for countries?
Countries face pressure to conform to China's interpretation of the 'One China' policy to access its market, which may affect their diplomatic autonomy and foreign policy decisions.
What was India's response to China's claims?
India has reaffirmed its recognition of Beijing as the government of China while rejecting any broader interpretations of the 'One China' policy that would undermine its strategic autonomy.
How have other nations reacted to China's approach?
Countries like Lithuania and the Czech Republic have experienced coercive trade measures and reduced business opportunities due to their interactions with Taiwan, exemplifying the punitive nature of China's approach.
