Trump's Russian diesel deal draws fire as Graham Act deadline looms Oct 18
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Indian-American Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi has sharply escalated his attacks on President Donald Trump's decision to purchase Russian diesel, calling the move 'illegal and ineffective', even as Kremlin envoy Kirill Dmitriev defended the deal on X. The controversy intensifies with the Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026 deadline just days away — a law that could impose tariffs of up to 100 per cent on major buyers of Russian oil, including India and China.
Krishnamoorthi's Broadside
The Illinois Democrat and member of the House Intelligence Committee posted a series of pointed criticisms on X on Wednesday. 'Trump started an illegal war with Iran that sent fuel prices soaring. Now he's rewarding Putin with a Russian diesel deal while pressuring Ukraine to stop striking Russian oil facilities,' Krishnamoorthi wrote.
In a follow-up post, he added: 'Putin gets billions. Ukraine gets more Russian attacks. Americans get stuck with the bill.' He further described the arrangement as one that 'would help bankroll Putin's war machine without meaningfully lowering fuel prices for Americans', concluding: 'It's illegal, ineffective, and no substitute for ending Trump's Iran war.'
The Kremlin Pushes Back
Kirill Dmitriev, Russian President Vladimir Putin's special envoy for investment and economic cooperation, countered on X: 'All pragmatic world leaders who care about their people want affordable diesel, gas and oil, including from Russia.' Dmitriev also attacked The Economist, claiming the publication failed to acknowledge a 5 per cent decline in diesel prices stemming from the deal and its benefits to 'US farmers, consumers and energy markets'. Notably, Dmitriev did not specify the methodology or time period behind the 5 per cent figure.
Growing Opposition on Capitol Hill
Congressional criticism has widened beyond Krishnamoorthi. Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat, said he was 'leading 12 of my colleagues demanding that Trump rescind the disastrous Russian diesel deal', adding that it 'betrays American security interests and brave Ukrainians fighting Putin's bloody slaughter.'
Representative James Clyburn of South Carolina called the decision 'a mistake', arguing it would 'do little to lower US fuel prices but a lot to fund Russia's war against our ally Ukraine.' Representative Greg Stanton of Arizona said the plan was 'likely illegal and unlikely to lower prices', warning it would 'funnel billions of dollars into Putin's Russia.' Representative Mike Levin of California labelled it 'a lifeline for Russia's war machine', citing a New York Times estimate that roughly $4 billion of American money could flow into Russia's economy.
The Legal Framework: OFAC Licence and Graham Act
The Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued General Licence 135 on the preceding Friday, authorising transactions involving Russian-origin diesel through April 2027. The Trump administration has not publicly stated how it intends to apply the Graham Act, whose Section 113 deadline falls on 18 October 2026.
Under Section 113, the President is required to raise duties to 'up to 100 per cent' on goods from any country that ranked among the five largest importers of Russian crude oil or natural gas and knowingly makes new purchases after the deadline. The President retains the power to waive the duties by certifying to Congress that doing so is in the US national interest.
What It Means for India and China
New Delhi has consistently argued that it is held to a stricter standard than Western nations that continue to trade with Russia. India and China are both among the largest buyers of discounted Russian crude since Western sanctions tightened following the 2022 Ukraine invasion. Should the administration enforce the Graham Act without issuing a waiver, both countries could face secondary tariff exposure — a development with significant implications for India's energy import bill and bilateral trade with the United States. The administration's silence on its enforcement approach has left New Delhi and Beijing in a state of strategic uncertainty heading into the 18 October deadline.