4 Bihar cops suspended for negligence in Bunty Yadav murder, Patna
Synopsis
Four Bihar Police personnel — including three ASIs and a Home Guard — were just 100 metres from the spot when Bunty Yadav was allegedly abducted near Patna Junction on 6 July. They neither intervened nor raised an alarm. His body was found five days later. The suspension exposes a systemic failure at the heart of Patna's emergency response network.
Key Takeaways
Bihar Police suspended four personnel on 14 July for negligence in the Bunty Yadav murder case in Patna .
Suspended personnel — ASIs Praveen Kumar Pankaj, Avadhesh Kumar, Veer Bahadur Singh , and Home Guard Sudarshan Prasad — were part of the Dial-112 team stationed just 100 metres from the abduction site.
Bunty Yadav was allegedly abducted from Patna Junction on the night of 6 July ; his body was recovered nearly five days later.
Jakkanpur police station allegedly refused to register a complaint from the family, despite Zero FIR provisions.
Minister Ram Kripal Yadav and MP Pappu Yadav met the family and demanded strict action and a speedy trial.
Pappu Yadav called for ₹1 crore compensation, a government job, and security for the victim's family.
Bihar Police suspended four personnel with immediate effect on Tuesday, 14 July for alleged negligence in the Bunty Yadav murder case in Patna, following a departmental inquiry ordered by Superintendent of Police (Central) Mamta Kalyani. The action comes after Yadav was allegedly abducted and killed, with his body recovered nearly five days after he went missing.
Who Was Suspended
The suspended personnel are Assistant Sub-Inspectors Praveen Kumar Pankaj, Avadhesh Kumar, and Veer Bahadur Singh, along with Home Guard Sudarshan Prasad. All four have been attached to the New Police Lines, Patna for the duration of their suspension and directed to submit written explanations to the department within three days.
What Went Wrong That Night
According to officials, the suspended personnel were part of the Dial-112 emergency response team and a patrolling unit positioned just 100 metres from the spot where Bunty Yadav was allegedly abducted from the Patna Junction area on the night of 6 July. Despite their proximity, they neither detected the incident nor intervened in time — a lapse the department has categorised as a serious dereliction of duty.
CCTV footage of the alleged abduction subsequently surfaced. Yadav's family had repeatedly appealed to police for swift action, but his body was recovered approximately five days after the abduction. Investigators also believe the accused had attempted to conceal the victim's identity.
Political Pressure Mounts
The case has drawn sharp political attention. Minister Ram Kripal Yadav and Purnea MP Rajesh Ranjan, popularly known as Pappu Yadav, separately met the victim's family on Tuesday and demanded strict action against those responsible.
Minister Yadav alleged that when the victim's relatives approached Jakkanpur police station, their complaint was not registered and they were turned away on jurisdictional grounds — despite provisions under law for lodging a Zero FIR and transferring the case to the relevant station. He also raised allegations that Bunty Yadav had reportedly been speaking out against a sex racket that was allegedly active in the area for an extended period.
MP's Demands for the Family
Pappu Yadav extended financial assistance to the victim's family during his visit and called for a speedy trial. He urged the government to provide a government job to a family member, a compensation of ₹1 crore, and adequate security for the family going forward.
What Comes Next
The departmental inquiry is ongoing and the four suspended personnel must submit their written responses within the stipulated window. The case has triggered sustained criticism over the effectiveness of Patna's patrolling arrangements and the initial police response to the abduction. Investigators continue to pursue the accused, and political pressure for a fast-track trial is likely to intensify.
Point of View
But it addresses the symptom rather than the disease. Officers stationed 100 metres from an abduction site — on an active emergency response deployment — failing to notice or intervene points to a structural breakdown in Patna's Dial-112 system, not merely individual negligence. The alleged refusal to register a Zero FIR at Jakkanpur station compounds the failure: it suggests that procedural gatekeeping overrode a fundamental duty. With political figures now publicly raising allegations of a sex racket linked to the victim, investigators face pressure to establish whether the initial police inaction was systemic indifference or something more deliberate.
NationPress
14 Jul 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Why were four Bihar Police personnel suspended in the Bunty Yadav case?
The four were suspended for alleged dereliction of duty after being positioned just 100 metres from the spot where Bunty Yadav was allegedly abducted near Patna Junction on 6 July, yet failing to detect or intervene in the incident. The action was ordered by SP (Central) Mamta Kalyani following a departmental inquiry.
Who are the suspended Bihar Police personnel?
The suspended personnel are Assistant Sub-Inspectors Praveen Kumar Pankaj, Avadhesh Kumar, and Veer Bahadur Singh, along with Home Guard Sudarshan Prasad. All four belonged to the Dial-112 emergency response and patrolling unit on duty that night.
What happened to Bunty Yadav?
Bunty Yadav was allegedly abducted by a group of criminals from the Patna Junction area on the night of 6 July. His body was recovered approximately five days later. CCTV footage of the alleged abduction had surfaced, and investigators believe the accused also attempted to conceal the victim's identity.
What did Minister Ram Kripal Yadav and MP Pappu Yadav demand?
Both leaders met the victim's family on 14 July and demanded strict action against those responsible. Minister Yadav alleged that Jakkanpur police station refused to register a complaint despite Zero FIR provisions, and raised concerns about an alleged sex racket in the area. MP Pappu Yadav called for ₹1 crore compensation, a government job for a family member, security for the family, and a speedy trial.
What is a Zero FIR and why is it relevant here?
A Zero FIR allows any police station to register a complaint regardless of jurisdiction and then transfer it to the relevant station — a provision designed to prevent victims from being turned away. In this case, officials allege that Jakkanpur police station refused to register the family's complaint on jurisdictional grounds, potentially delaying the investigation.
