Did AIADMK MLA Jayaraman and his son file a Rs 1 crore defamation suit against YouTube channels?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
AIADMK MLA Pollachi V. Jayaraman and his son Pravin have launched a Rs 1 crore defamation lawsuit against YouTube channels, alleging false connections to a notorious sexual assault case. The hearing is set to resume next week amid rising public interest and ongoing legal battles. Will this case redefine accountability in media reporting?
Key Takeaways
- Legal Action: AIADMK MLA and son file a defamation suit.
- Damages Sought: Rs 1 crore in compensation requested.
- Injunction Requested: Plaintiffs seek a ban on future defamatory statements.
- Media Accountability: Highlights the need for responsible reporting.
- Public Interest: Case draws significant media coverage and public scrutiny.
Chennai, May 29 (NationPress) AIADMK MLA and former Deputy Speaker Pollachi V. Jayaraman, alongside his son Pravin Jayaraman, has initiated a civil defamation lawsuit amounting to Rs 1 crore in the Madras High Court. This legal action targets eight YouTube channels and three guest speakers associated with them.
The lawsuit claims that the defendants have made defamatory statements that wrongfully associate the father-son duo with the Pollachi serial sexual assault case, which has sparked significant public outrage and created a high-profile trial backdrop.
The case was presented for hearing before Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy on Thursday, but the proceedings were postponed for a week upon the request of a junior counsel representing the plaintiffs.
The court acknowledged the presence of advocate P.T. Perumal, who indicated he would represent Nakheeran Gopal, the editor of Nakheeran magazine and the first defendant in this case.
In their petition, the plaintiffs not only seek financial compensation but also a permanent injunction to prevent the defendants from making any further insinuations—whether directly or indirectly—tying them to the sexual assault case. Additionally, they are demanding that the defendants cover the legal costs.
Two interim applications accompanied the main lawsuit; the first seeks a temporary injunction to halt the publication of any content that connects the father and son to the case, while the second requests the removal of existing videos that allegedly contain defamatory material.
The videos in question were uploaded between May 13 and May 15, 2025, by channels such as Nakheeran TV, AranSei, Jeeva Today, Jambavan TV, Galatta Voice, The Debate, Tamil Nadu Now, and IBC Tamil.
This case has drawn renewed attention following a verdict from a Mahila Court in Coimbatore on May 13, which sentenced nine individuals to life imprisonment for their involvement in the serial sexual assault case that first emerged in 2019.
The High Court is anticipated to continue the hearing next week, as this legal dispute unfolds amidst claims that the allegations have severely harmed the plaintiffs' public image, resulting in emotional and reputational damage.
Point of View
The defamation suit by AIADMK MLA Jayaraman and his son highlights critical issues surrounding media responsibility and the impact of public discourse on individuals' reputations. It underscores the necessity for accuracy and integrity in reporting, particularly in sensitive cases with far-reaching implications.
NationPress
08/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the basis of the defamation suit filed by Jayaraman and his son?
The basis of the defamation suit is the alleged defamatory remarks made by eight YouTube channels linking them to the Pollachi serial sexual assault case.
What are the plaintiffs seeking through this lawsuit?
The plaintiffs are seeking Rs 1 crore in damages and a permanent injunction against future defamatory remarks, along with the costs of litigation.
What action was taken by the court regarding this case?
The court has postponed the hearing for a week, allowing the plaintiffs' junior counsel to request additional time.
What do the interim applications entail?
The interim applications include a request for a temporary injunction against publishing content linking them to the case and the removal of existing videos with defamatory content.
Why has this case gained renewed attention?
The case has gained renewed attention following a recent verdict in the Pollachi sexual assault case, where nine individuals were sentenced to life imprisonment.
