Akhilesh Yadav hits CM over Rs 2.5 cr/day 'fake publicity'
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The public has swept away the lies with a broom of truth — that is how Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav framed what he described as a stinging electoral rebuke of Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath's government on Monday, 2 November 2026. In a sharp post on X, Akhilesh accused the Chief Minister of spending Rs 2.5 crore per day on what he called false propaganda — and claimed the people had delivered their verdict.
In Hindi, Akhilesh wrote: 'Mukhyamantri ji ke 2.5 crore rupaye pratidin ke jhoothe prachar par janta ne sach ki jhaadu chala di' — 'The public has wielded the broom of truth against the Chief Minister's false publicity costing Rs 2.5 crore a day.' The language is pointed: the metaphor of a jhaadu (broom) as an instrument of political cleansing carries unmistakable resonance in Indian electoral discourse.
The Rs 2.5 crore charge and what it signals
The specific figure of Rs 2.5 crore per day is the sharpest edge of Akhilesh's attack. Opposition parties in Uttar Pradesh have long contested the scale of the state government's advertising and publicity expenditure, arguing that public funds are deployed to burnish the ruling party's image ahead of elections. Akhilesh's framing — that this spending constitutes 'false propaganda' — is a direct challenge to the narrative the Bharatiya Janata Party government has built since coming to power in 2017.
The Samajwadi Party, founded by Mulayam Singh Yadav, has consistently positioned itself as the principal opposition force in India's most populous state. Social-media salvos of this kind — timed to electoral moments, laced with vivid imagery — have become a signature weapon in that contest. The broom metaphor, the precise rupee figure, the direct invocation of 'the public' as judge: each element is calibrated for viral reach among UP voters.
Electoral context behind the post
Posts referencing public rejection of government propaganda typically surface around by-elections or major polling events in Uttar Pradesh. Akhilesh's choice of words — 'the public has acted' — suggests he is reading a specific result or mood shift as vindication of the SP's anti-incumbency pitch. Whether this is tied to a by-poll outcome or a broader survey of public sentiment, the message to the BJP is unambiguous: the opposition believes the advertising crore is not converting to votes.
The Chief Minister's office had not issued a formal response at the time of publication. In a state where every electoral cycle is treated as a semi-final for the next assembly contest, the exchange is unlikely to stop here.