Why Did IAS Officer Arvind Kumar Reappear Before ACB in the Formula E Case?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Arvind Kumar is under scrutiny for his role in the Formula E race.
- The ACB is investigating allegations of misuse of government funds.
- This is not Kumar's first appearance; he was previously questioned in January.
- The case includes former minister K. T. Rama Rao and others.
- Legal actions have been initiated under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Hyderabad, July 3 (NationPress) The senior IAS officer of Telangana and Special Chief Secretary Arvind Kumar made another appearance before the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) on Thursday regarding the Formula E race investigation.
Officials from the agency, who are examining claims of unauthorized misuse of government funds, interrogated him at the ACB office in Hyderabad.
Previously, Arvind Kumar was issued a notice but could not attend due to being abroad. He received a new notice upon his return earlier this week.
This marks the second occasion that Arvind Kumar has been questioned by the ACB concerning this matter, with his initial appearance occurring in January.
The IAS officer has been called in nearly three weeks after Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) and former minister K. T. Rama Rao faced questioning from the ACB for the second time.
On June 16, the ACB interrogated K. T. Rama Rao (KTR) for almost eight hours.
The former minister had first appeared before the ACB on January 9, related to the management of the Formula E race in Hyderabad in January 2023, during the BRS's tenure.
In December of the previous year, the ACB initiated a case against KTR, former Special Chief Secretary of Municipal Administration and Urban Development (MA&UD) Arvind Kumar, and the former Chief Engineer of Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA), B.L.N. Reddy, for alleged irregularities amounting to Rs 54.88 crore in the Formula-E agreement.
The FIR was lodged following a complaint from Principal Secretary of MA&UD, M. Dana Kishore, who claimed that foreign remittances were made without necessary approvals from the relevant regulatory bodies, leading to an additional tax burden of Rs 8.06 crore on the HMDA.
The complaint also alleged that payments were processed while the Model Code of Conduct was active for the Legislative Assembly elections, without prior consent from the Election Commission of India.
The FIR was filed under the Prevention of Corruption Act and relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), specifically sections 409 (criminal breach of trust) and 120B (criminal conspiracy).