Is the Bengal Government Seeking Legal Action Against Adhikari for the 'Nabanna Avijan' Protest?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The West Bengal government's recent move to file an FIR against Suvendu Adhikari, the Leader of the Opposition, raises significant questions about political accountability and law enforcement's role in protests. This incident, linked to the violent 'Nabanna Avijan' protest, highlights ongoing tensions in the region and the complex intersection of politics and justice.
Key Takeaways
- West Bengal government seeks FIR against Suvendu Adhikari.
- Legal proceedings require court permission due to Supreme Court ruling.
- Nabanna Avijan protest linked to tragic anniversary.
- Violence erupted between protesters and police.
- Political tensions continue to escalate in the region.
Kolkata, Aug 14 (NationPress) The West Bengal government on Thursday approached a single-judge Bench of Calcutta High Court to obtain permission for filing an FIR against the Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in the West Bengal Assembly, Suvendu Adhikari. This request is linked to his involvement in the 'Nabanna Avijan' (march to the state secretariat) on August 9, an event that turned violent, coinciding with the first anniversary of the horrific rape and murder of a female doctor at R.G. Kar Hospital.
The state administration sought the Calcutta High Court's approval because the LoP is entitled to a “protection from FIRs” granted by the Supreme Court in 2022. The apex court ruled that any FIR against him must receive prior authorization from the court.
On Thursday, the government presented its case to Justice Jay Sengupta's single-judge Bench, requesting the necessary permission to proceed with the FIR against Adhikari.
During the hearing, Adhikari's legal representative contended that since the Supreme Court had extended protection to him, the High Court lacked jurisdiction to address the issue.
Concluding the session, Justice Sengupta’s Bench upheld the argument from the LoP’s counsel, stating that without new direction from an “appropriate” court, they could not entertain the case.
The anniversary of the tragic incident involving the junior doctor was disrupted by significant violence after clashes erupted between law enforcement and demonstrators at the 'Nabanna Avijan'.
The victim’s mother claimed that she was assaulted by police as she and other protesters attempted to march towards Nabanna.
Additionally, both the victim's mother and BJP leaders accused police actions of damaging a sacred conch shell-bangle on her wrist, a traditional symbol of married Hindu women in Bengal.
In the aftermath, five police personnel sustained injuries during the altercation, and on Tuesday, Kolkata Police summoned BJP MLA Ashok Dinda to respond to allegations of threatening police officers during the 'Nabanna Avijan' protest on August 9.
The MLA has been instructed to report to the New Market Police Station on August 17.
Point of View
It's crucial to maintain a balanced perspective. The West Bengal government's attempt to pursue legal action against opposition leaders reflects ongoing political tensions. While accountability is vital, it’s essential to consider the broader implications for democracy and civil liberties in India. NationPress will continue to report on these developments with expertise and fairness.
NationPress
20/08/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the 'Nabanna Avijan' protest about?
The 'Nabanna Avijan' protest was a march to the state secretariat in West Bengal that turned violent, coinciding with the anniversary of a tragic incident involving the rape and murder of a doctor.
Why does Suvendu Adhikari have protection from FIRs?
Suvendu Adhikari enjoys protection from FIRs as granted by the Supreme Court in 2022, requiring state authorities to seek court approval before filing any charges against him.
What were the consequences of the protests?
The protests resulted in violent clashes with police, injuries to several officers, and the summoning of BJP MLA Ashok Dinda for allegedly threatening police.
What is the significance of the court's involvement?
The involvement of the Calcutta High Court is crucial as it determines whether the West Bengal government can proceed with legal action against an opposition leader, impacting political dynamics in the state.
How does this incident affect political accountability in West Bengal?
This incident raises questions about the balance of power, political accountability, and the role of law enforcement in handling protests in West Bengal.
