Is the 'Nabanna Avijan' Protest Leading to Legal Action Against Adhikari?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a recent turn of events, the West Bengal government has attempted to pursue legal action against Suvendu Adhikari, the Leader of the Opposition, following his participation in the violent 'Nabanna Avijan' protest. The court's refusal to allow the FIR raises questions about political protection and accountability. What lies ahead for Adhikari and the ongoing tensions?
Key Takeaways
- West Bengal government sought permission for an FIR against Suvendu Adhikari.
- Supreme Court protections complicate legal actions against political figures.
- 'Nabanna Avijan' protest resulted in violent clashes and injuries.
- The court hearing emphasized the jurisdictional limits on legal actions.
- Allegations of police misconduct have emerged from the protests.
Kolkata, Aug 14 (NationPress) On Thursday, the West Bengal government sought the approval of a single-judge Bench at the Calcutta High Court to file an FIR against the Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in the West Bengal Assembly, Suvendu Adhikari. This request stems from Adhikari's involvement in the 'Nabanna Avijan' (march to the state secretariat) on August 9, which turned violent, coinciding with the first anniversary of the tragic rape and murder of a female doctor at R.G. Kar Hospital. However, the court rejected the plea.
The state government approached the Calcutta High Court for this action because the LoP is granted “protection from FIRs” by the Supreme Court since 2022. The apex court mandated that state authorities must obtain court permission prior to registering an FIR against him.
On Thursday, the state government presented its case to Justice Jay Sengupta of the single-judge Bench to seek authorization for filing an FIR against Adhikari.
During the hearing, Adhikari's legal representative contended that the protection provided by the Supreme Court meant that the Calcutta High Court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case.
Ultimately, Justice Sengupta’s Bench concurred with the arguments of LoP Adhikari's counsel, stating that without fresh directives from “an appropriate” court, his Bench could not proceed with the matter.
The violent protests on the first anniversary of the horrific incident involving a junior doctor of RG Kar Medical College and Hospital on August 9 were marked by clashes between law enforcement and demonstrators participating in the 'Nabanna Avijan'.
The victim's mother accused the police of assaulting her after she, along with her husband and fellow protesters, attempted to march toward Nabanna.
It was also reported that the police action resulted in the breaking of her sacred conch shell-bangle, a traditional symbol of married Hindu women in Bengal.
Moreover, five police officers sustained injuries during the altercations with protesters, and on Tuesday, the Kolkata Police summoned BJP MLA Ashok Dinda to appear regarding allegations of threatening policemen during the 'Nabanna Avijan' on August 9.
Dinda has been requested to report to the New Market Police Station on August 17.
Point of View
It is crucial to understand the delicate balance between civil unrest and legal accountability. The situation in West Bengal showcases the challenges faced when political figures engage in protests. We must approach this matter with a focus on truth and integrity, ensuring that all sides are fairly represented while emphasizing the importance of law and order.
NationPress
20/08/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did the West Bengal government seek an FIR against Suvendu Adhikari?
The government aimed to file an FIR due to Adhikari's involvement in the violent 'Nabanna Avijan' protest, which coincided with a significant anniversary related to a tragic incident.
What protections does Suvendu Adhikari have?
Suvendu Adhikari has been granted 'protection from FIRs' by the Supreme Court, requiring state authorities to seek permission before filing any charges against him.
What happened during the 'Nabanna Avijan' protest?
The protest saw violent clashes between police and demonstrators, resulting in injuries and allegations of police misconduct against the victim's family.
What was the outcome of the court hearing?
The Calcutta High Court rejected the government's plea to file an FIR against Adhikari, stating that it lacked jurisdiction due to the Supreme Court's protections.
Who else is involved in the ongoing situation?
BJP MLA Ashok Dinda has also been summoned by the Kolkata Police for allegedly threatening police officers during the protest.
