BJD challenges BJP to open debate on MMDR Amendment Bill, cites ₹1.5 lakh crore Odisha loss

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
BJD challenges BJP to open debate on MMDR Amendment Bill, cites ₹1.5 lakh crore Odisha loss

Synopsis

BJD has thrown down the gauntlet to BJP over the MMDR Amendment Bill, alleging Odisha alone could lose ₹1.5 lakh crore in arrears and ₹12,000 crore annually — rights the Supreme Court had explicitly upheld in July 2024. The party's open debate challenge puts Odisha's 20 BJP Lok Sabha MPs in a difficult spot.

Key Takeaways

The BJD challenged the BJP to an open debate over the MMDR Amendment Bill at a press conference in Bhubaneswar on 21 August .
The party alleged Odisha stands to lose ₹1.5 lakh crore in arrears and ₹12,000 crore annually in mining revenue due to the Bill.
A nine-judge Supreme Court Constitution Bench in July 2024 had upheld states' rights to levy taxes on minerals and recover dues from 1 April 2005 .
BJD criticised all 20 Lok Sabha and 5 Rajya Sabha BJP MPs from Odisha for supporting the legislation.
Former Union Minister Dharmendra Pradhan's claim that Odisha would suffer no loss was rejected as 'far removed from reality' by the BJD.

The opposition Biju Janata Dal (BJD) in Odisha on Friday, 21 August challenged the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to an open debate over the recently passed Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, alleging the legislation strips mineral-rich states of constitutionally guaranteed revenue rights. The party specifically targeted former Union Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, rejecting his claim that Odisha would suffer no financial loss.

Key Allegations at the Press Conference

At a press conference held at Sankha Bhawan in Bhubaneswar, former Minister and MLA Dr Arun Sahoo and Senior BJD General Secretary Bhrugu Baxipatra alleged that the Bill was passed in the Lok Sabha without any discussion, and would cause extensive losses not only to Odisha but to all mineral-rich states across the country.

Sahoo pointed to a landmark July 2024 ruling by a nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court, which upheld states' rights over mines and mineral-bearing lands, including the power to impose levies and taxes. Crucially, the bench had also ruled that states could recover outstanding taxes from mining companies with effect from 1 April 2005.

The Financial Stakes for Odisha

'Accordingly, it was estimated that Odisha alone could recover around ₹1.5 lakh crore as arrears. In addition, it was estimated that the state could earn additional ₹12,000 crore annually in mining revenue. However, through the MMDR Amendment Bill, the Central Government has taken away Odisha's legitimate entitlement,' alleged Sahoo.

He further criticised the 20 Lok Sabha and five Rajya Sabha MPs from the BJP representing Odisha for supporting the legislation, arguing they had acted against the state's fiscal interests.

BJD Hits Back at Pradhan's Defence

Rejecting Pradhan's assertion that former Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik was misleading the public over the Bill's financial impact, Sahoo highlighted how Patnaik had transformed Odisha from a revenue-stressed state in 2000 into a fiscal success story by 2024, with mining sector revenues playing a central role in that turnaround.

'Revenue generated from the mining sector played an important role in the development of the State. Unfortunately, after bringing in the MMDR Amendment Bill, the BJP Government has sacrificed the interests of Odisha and handed over the power to collect taxes from the mining sector to the Central Government,' Sahoo alleged.

BJD Vows to Intensify Opposition

BJD leader Baxipatra said Pradhan's claim that Odisha would not suffer any loss was 'far removed from reality.' He stated that the BJD would strongly oppose what he called an 'arbitrary law' and would intensify its struggle in the coming days in the interest of Odisha and its people. This comes amid broader concerns from multiple mineral-rich states over the Centre's increasing role in regulating sub-soil resources — a domain states have long considered their own. The BJP is yet to formally respond to the BJD's open debate challenge.

Point of View

But Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, and Rajasthan face analogous exposure. The open-debate challenge is political theatre, but the underlying fiscal arithmetic deserves a serious, public answer.
NationPress
22 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the MMDR Amendment Bill and why is it controversial?
The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill is a central legislation that critics allege transfers the power to collect taxes from the mining sector from state governments to the Centre. It is controversial because a Supreme Court Constitution Bench ruling in July 2024 had explicitly upheld states' rights to levy taxes and recover mining dues — rights the BJD says the Bill now overrides.
How much revenue does Odisha stand to lose under the MMDR Amendment Bill?
According to BJD leaders, Odisha could lose approximately ₹1.5 lakh crore in tax arrears recoverable from mining companies since 1 April 2005, and an estimated ₹12,000 crore in annual mining revenue going forward. These figures are attributed to BJD's own estimates and have been contested by BJP's Dharmendra Pradhan.
What did the Supreme Court rule on states' mining rights in 2024?
In July 2024, a nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court ruled that states have rights over mines and mineral-bearing lands and can impose levies and taxes on minerals. The bench also held that states could recover outstanding taxes from mining companies with effect from 1 April 2005.
Why did BJD target Dharmendra Pradhan specifically?
The BJD targeted former Union Minister Dharmendra Pradhan because he publicly claimed that Odisha would not suffer any financial loss due to the MMDR Amendment Bill and accused former Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik of misleading the public. BJD leaders rejected both claims and accused Pradhan of defending a law that undermines Odisha's fiscal interests.
What is BJD's next step in opposing the MMDR Amendment Bill?
BJD General Secretary Bhrugu Baxipatra stated the party will strongly oppose the Bill and intensify its struggle in the coming days. The party has also challenged BJP to an open public debate on the legislation's financial impact on Odisha.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 days ago
  2. 1 week ago
  3. 1 week ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 4 months ago
  6. 7 months ago
  7. 9 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google