Did BJP Endorse Ex-CJI Gavai's Views on Judiciary Independence?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
On November 27, the BJP praised the former Chief Justice of India, B.R. Gavai, for his claim that the judiciary operates without government interference. This comes amid allegations from opposition leaders regarding political influence over judicial matters. The Congress responded, labeling Gavai's comments as personal opinions amidst ongoing tensions.
Key Takeaways
- B.R. Gavai asserts there is no government interference in judiciary.
- The BJP endorses Gavai's remarks as a reflection of democracy.
- The Congress labels the statement as personal and points to perceived governmental control.
- Judicial independence remains a focal point in ongoing political debates.
- Gavai emphasizes the collegium's decision-making process is independent.
New Delhi, Nov 27 (NationPress) The BJP expressed approval on Thursday regarding the former Chief Justice of India, B.R. Gavai's statement that there is no governmental interference in the operations or verdicts of the judiciary.
This declaration emerges amidst persistent accusations from various political figures, including Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, who have alleged that the BJP and the RSS exert undue influence over constitutional bodies.
Gandhi has repeatedly asserted that the judiciary is subjected to pressures from the administration headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
In an interview with IANS, BJP MP Praveen Khandelwal remarked, "With B.R. Gavai's assertion, it should become abundantly clear to those who, driven by their political agenda, accuse the Supreme Court of operating under governmental pressure daily. Gavai has only recently stepped down from the Chief Justice position, making his comments particularly significant."
BJP MP Yogender Chandolia added that Gavai's statements epitomize the essence of India's democratic values.
He conveyed to IANS, "The remarks from B.R. Gavai, a distinguished former Supreme Court judge, post-retirement, embody the spirit of our democracy. The Constitution is inviolable; this is a sentiment we have consistently expressed. The Congress Party and its allies ought to realize that the Constitution represents the soul of our nation, and no entity holds the authority to modify it for personal gain."
BJP MLA Ram Kadam criticized the Opposition, stating they must recognize and respect the insights of the country's esteemed former judicial leaders.
In a conversation with IANS, Kadam asserted that Gavai's statement sends a clear warning regarding how the Congress misrepresents facts and creates misinformation about the Constitution, serving as a stern caution to those who mislead the public on constitutional issues.
In contrast, the Congress Party maintained that the former CJI's opinion is merely personal and referenced previous controversies.
Congress MP Tariq Anwar mentioned to IANS, "This might be his personal perspective, but it remains a fact that the government is attempting to bring all constitutional authorities under its dominion."
Congress spokesperson Surendra Rajput reiterated that while it may be Justice Gavai's individual view, he would like to remind him that five judges had taken to the streets advocating for justice.
Former CJI D.Y. Chandrachud had also addressed similar criticisms, stating that courts should not be perceived as opposition entities; their duty is to evaluate laws, not to replace elected officials.
In an exclusive interview with IANS on Thursday, former CJI Gavai refuted claims of governmental meddling and clarified the workings of the collegium system.
"Government interference is nonexistent. It is crucial that when the collegium arrives at a decision, numerous inputs are considered, including the perspectives of the executive, the Intelligence Bureau, and the law ministry.
"Furthermore, the views of consulted judges, relevant chief justices, chief ministers, and governors are taken into account. Following extensive discussions, the collegium makes an independent decision. This does not imply that the collegium operates under duress," he emphasized.
Point of View
The remarks by former CJI B.R. Gavai highlight the ongoing tension between the judiciary and political entities. The BJP's endorsement of Gavai's statement reinforces their stance on judicial independence, while the Congress's rebuttal emphasizes the perceived threats to constitutional authority. It is crucial for all parties to engage in constructive dialogue to uphold democratic principles.
NationPress
27/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did B.R. Gavai say about government interference?
B.R. Gavai stated that there is no governmental interference in the judiciary's functions or decisions, emphasizing the independence of the judicial system.
How did the Congress respond to Gavai's remarks?
The Congress described Gavai's comments as his personal opinion and reiterated their stance that the government is attempting to control constitutional authorities.
What is the significance of Gavai's statement?
Gavai's statement is significant as it addresses ongoing concerns about the influence of politics on the judiciary, particularly amidst accusations from opposition leaders.
Who are the key political figures mentioned?
Key figures include former Chief Justice B.R. Gavai, BJP MP Praveen Khandelwal, Congress MP Rahul Gandhi, and spokesperson Surendra Rajput.
What implications do these statements have for India's democracy?
These statements raise critical questions about the independence of the judiciary and the balance of power between constitutional authorities and the government.
