Kerala BJP accuses Congress of shielding Pinarayi Vijayan in ED hawala case

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Kerala BJP accuses Congress of shielding Pinarayi Vijayan in ED hawala case

Synopsis

Kerala BJP chief Rajeev Chandrasekhar has levelled a pointed allegation: that Congress deliberately sat on a High Court order for four days before registering an FIR against former CM Pinarayi Vijayan — timing that allowed Vijayan to file a court appeal within 30 minutes of the FIR. With 17 days of SIT inaction now under the microscope, the case is fast becoming a litmus test for whether Kerala's new government is serious about accountability or playing coalition politics.

Key Takeaways

Kerala BJP President Rajeev Chandrasekhar accused Congress of shielding former CM Pinarayi Vijayan in an ED hawala probe on 13 October 2026 .
The state government registered an FIR four days after the Kerala High Court ordered action — a delay the BJP called deliberate.
Vijayan reportedly filed a High Court appeal within half an hour of the FIR being registered.
The SIT has been operational for 17 days with no public update on its progress, despite a 14-day statutory limit for preliminary inquiry.
BJP alleged that Congress and IUML fear the probe could extend to alleged hawala links within the Congress-led Cabinet itself.

Kerala Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) President Rajeev Chandrasekhar on Tuesday, 13 October accused the Congress-led state government of deliberately delaying legal action against former Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan to shield him from an Enforcement Directorate (ED) probe into alleged hawala transactions. The allegations were made in Thiruvananthapuram, intensifying the political battle over the ongoing investigation in Kerala.

The FIR Delay at the Centre of the Row

Chandrasekhar zeroed in on a four-day gap between a Kerala High Court order directing the state government to act on the allegations and the eventual registration of an FIR against Vijayan. He questioned whether the delay was engineered to give the former Chief Minister time to mount a legal challenge.

His suspicion appears to be backed by timing: Vijayan reportedly filed an appeal in the High Court within half an hour of the FIR being registered, according to Chandrasekhar. 'Was the delay intended to allow Vijayan to approach the court?' the BJP leader asked, calling it a pattern of political protection rather than due process.

SIT Progress Under Scrutiny

Chandrasekhar also turned his attention to the Special Investigation Team (SIT) formed to probe the case, saying seventeen days had elapsed since its constitution with no clarity on the steps taken. 'The law allows a maximum of 14 days for a preliminary inquiry. What has the SIT done during that period?' he said, questioning the pace and direction of the investigation.

He alleged that the Congress and its ally, the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML), feared the probe could expand to cover alleged hawala transactions implicating members of the Congress-led Cabinet itself — a claim that, if substantiated, would significantly widen the scope of the controversy.

Congress Accused of Double Standards

Chandrasekhar alleged that the Congress had initially committed to following the law without political vendetta when the SIT was set up, but had since retreated from that position. He accused the party of prioritising its own political interests over legal accountability and charged that the Congress and the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI-M) had effectively become allies — both in Kerala and at the national level.

This comes amid the ED having directed Kerala Police Chief Ravada Azad Chandrasekhar to register a case last month. The BJP's broader narrative is that the Congress, despite being in power in the state, is unwilling to pursue a serious investigation that could embarrass the CPI-M, its rival turned ally in the eyes of the BJP.

Political Context and What Comes Next

The accusations reflect a deepening triangular tension in Kerala politics — BJP attempting to hold both Congress and CPI-M simultaneously accountable, while Congress faces pressure to demonstrate its independence from the very party it defeated. Notably, this is not the first time the BJP has raised questions about the pace of the Kerala probe; similar concerns were voiced when the SIT was first constituted.

All eyes will now be on whether the SIT announces any concrete findings in the coming days, and whether Vijayan's High Court appeal results in a stay of proceedings that further complicates the investigation.

Point of View

A 30-minute court filing, 17 days of SIT silence — is more forensic than the usual political noise, and that is precisely why it demands a clear response from the Congress. Kerala's new government came to power partly on a promise of clean governance; allowing the SIT probe to drift without public milestones risks handing the BJP a legitimate accountability charge rather than a partisan one. The deeper question is structural: can a state government credibly investigate the party whose support it may need, or is institutional independence in such cases inherently compromised? The Congress has not yet answered that question publicly, and silence is itself a political signal.
NationPress
13 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the ED hawala case against Pinarayi Vijayan?
The Enforcement Directorate initiated a probe into alleged hawala transactions involving former Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and directed the Kerala Police Chief to register a case last month. The Kerala High Court subsequently ordered the state government to act on the allegations, leading to the registration of an FIR.
Why is the BJP accusing Congress of delaying the FIR?
BJP President Rajeev Chandrasekhar says the Congress-led state government waited four days after the Kerala High Court's order before registering the FIR against Vijayan. He alleged the delay was intentional, giving Vijayan time to file a High Court appeal — which he reportedly did within half an hour of the FIR being filed.
What is the current status of the SIT probe?
The Special Investigation Team has been in existence for 17 days, but BJP leader Chandrasekhar says there is no clarity on the steps it has taken. He pointed out that the law allows a maximum of 14 days for a preliminary inquiry, questioning what the team has done in that time.
Why does the BJP allege Congress and IUML fear the investigation?
Chandrasekhar alleged that Congress and the Indian Union Muslim League fear the probe could expand to cover alleged hawala transactions implicating members of the Congress-led Cabinet itself, giving both parties a shared interest in limiting the investigation's scope.
What is the political significance of these allegations in Kerala?
The accusations underscore a deepening rift in Kerala's political landscape, with the BJP trying to hold both Congress and CPI-M simultaneously accountable. It also raises questions about whether the Congress, now in power, can independently investigate allegations against CPI-M figures without being seen as protecting former political rivals who may now be informal allies.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 4 days ago
  2. 2 weeks ago
  3. 2 weeks ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 4 months ago
  6. 11 months ago
  7. 12 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google