BJP Calls Out Abdul Basit: Pakistan's Terrorism Dependency Exposed
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Mumbai, March 22 (NationPress) The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) criticized former Pakistani diplomat Abdul Basit for his recent comments regarding India, stating that they highlight Pakistan's dependence on terrorism for survival.
Basit, who previously served as Pakistan's High Commissioner to India, suggested during an interview on a local Pakistani television channel that Islamabad's strategy should include targeting Indian cities like New Delhi and Mumbai if the United States were to attack Pakistan.
He stated, "If America attacks Pakistan, we don’t even need to involve our nuclear capabilities. Our response will be to strike Mumbai and New Delhi. The world must recognize that if we face an assault, we will retaliate against India wherever we choose."
The BJP's National Spokesperson, Tuhin Sinha, sharply condemned Basit's remarks, asserting that they reveal Pakistan's ongoing instability, particularly after the recent military operations in the region. He emphasized, “Abdul Basit’s threats regarding bombings in Delhi and Mumbai indicate that Pakistan is still shaken by the impacts of Operation Sindoor. It reflects their mental instability.”
Labeling Pakistan a “terrorist state”, Sinha remarked, “It no longer requires elaboration. Last year, Pakistan's Army Chief, Asim Munir, warned the U.S. that they could target the oil refineries in Jamnagar. Now, a former envoy's comments further confirm that terrorism is embedded in their identity. Pakistan cannot exist without terrorism.”
He also highlighted Pakistan's airstrikes on a drug rehabilitation center in Kabul, noting, “During the holy month of Ramzan, Pakistan bombed Afghanistan, resulting in the deaths of 400 people. India condemned these actions, and now they threaten us.”
Sinha pointed out that Pakistan's reliance on terrorism has diminished following Operation Sindoor, stating, “By suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, India has significantly impacted Pakistan's calculations regarding promoting terrorism.”
He further criticized the previous UPA government for its inaction against Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, saying, “This marks a clear distinction between us and the UPA, which remained passive while we have actively responded, leaving them shocked and disoriented.”