BJP MLC C.T. Ravi questions Congress opposition to Karnataka electoral roll SIR

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
BJP MLC C.T. Ravi questions Congress opposition to Karnataka electoral roll SIR

Synopsis

BJP MLC C.T. Ravi has turned Karnataka's electoral roll revision into a sharp political battle, accusing Congress of opposing the SIR to protect alleged illegal immigrants on voter lists — while Congress counters that the exercise threatens legitimate voters. With the Chief Minister reportedly protesting at the Election Commission and the BJP filing objections at booths, the dispute is shaping up as a proxy war over voter identity ahead of future electoral cycles.

Key Takeaways

Ravi on 2 October in Bengaluru challenged Congress to explain its opposition to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.
Ravi claimed the SIR has been conducted 12 times nationally and involves 99 per cent state government officials, not central agencies.
He alleged large numbers of Bangladeshi nationals are living in Karnataka cities and coffee estates in Chikkamagaluru and Madikeri , and accused the Congress government of not forming an SIT to probe the issue.
Ravi dismissed Congress allegations against EVMs , arguing that Congress victories in Karnataka , Kerala , Telangana , and Himachal Pradesh disprove hacking claims.
He urged the Chief Election Commissioner to direct officers to verify all objections, and appealed to BLOs not to be intimidated.

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Member of the Legislative Council (MLC) C.T. Ravi on Friday, 2 October challenged the Congress to explain its resistance to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Karnataka, alleging that the ruling party was mounting politically motivated attacks against a constitutionally sanctioned process. Speaking to reporters in Bengaluru, Ravi argued that the SIR was a routine, legally grounded exercise and that objecting to it served narrow electoral interests.

Ravi's Core Challenge to Congress

Ravi pointed out that the SIR had reportedly been conducted 12 times across the country and was not initiated under a BJP government. 'Why is Congress afraid of SIR despite the process having been conducted several times?' he asked. He maintained that names could lawfully be removed from electoral rolls only for specific reasons — the voter being deceased, having shifted residence, or being registered at more than one location — and that the exercise was being carried out under constitutional and electoral provisions.

He further alleged that the Congress had considered the SIR acceptable during the tenures of Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi, and Sonia Gandhi, but now found it unacceptable solely because the BJP was the principal challenger. Critics of the SIR, however, argue that the timing and manner of the revision raise legitimate concerns about voter deletions affecting marginalised communities.

Illegal Immigration Allegations and the SIT Demand

Ravi escalated the political stakes by alleging that large numbers of illegal immigrants, including alleged Bangladeshi nationals, were living in Bengaluru and other Karnataka cities, and that thousands more were reportedly present in coffee estates in Chikkamagaluru and Madikeri districts. He accused the Congress-led state government of failing to constitute a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe reports of such individuals working in municipal corporations in Bengaluru.

He alleged that these immigrants were taking employment opportunities from Indian citizens and claimed that attempts to include them in electoral rolls would 'undermine democracy.' He urged the state government to launch a special investigation into illegal immigration and cautioned against what he described as compromising internal security for political gain.

On the SIR Process and State Government's Role

Ravi was emphatic that the SIR was not being driven by central agencies such as the Enforcement Directorate (ED) or the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). 'Nearly 99 per cent of the work is being carried out by officials of departments under the state government,' he said, including personnel from the Revenue and Education Departments. He added that if anything went wrong, the responsibility would rest with the state government.

He also rejected Congress claims that BJP representatives had submitted hundreds of objections simultaneously, stating that Booth Level Agents could file only the number of objections permitted in a single day. He reiterated that the submission of an objection did not automatically result in deletion — final verification rested with Booth Level Officers (BLOs) — and appealed to officials involved in the SIR not to be intimidated by alleged threats.

EVM Row and Counter-Allegations

Ravi also targeted Congress leaders — including Sonia Gandhi, Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, and Karnataka Congress chief D.K. Shivakumar — over allegations concerning Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs). He argued that if EVMs could indeed be hacked, Congress would not have won power in Karnataka, Kerala, Telangana, or Himachal Pradesh. He also noted that leaders such as Priyank Kharge and Mallikarjun Kharge's son-in-law would not have won their respective seats. He demanded that those making what he described as 'false allegations' against EVMs publicly apologise.

Political Context and What Comes Next

This comes amid heightened political friction in Karnataka over the SIR, with Chief Minister Siddaramaiah's government reportedly staging a protest at the Election Commission office — a move Ravi characterised as an attempt to deflect attention from allegations against the administration rather than address pressing issues such as drought. Ravi urged the Chief Election Commissioner to direct Returning Officers and Assistant Returning Officers to verify all objections thoroughly.

The BJP has indicated it will file complaints wherever irregularities are identified, keeping pressure on the state government as the SIR process continues toward its conclusion.

Point of View

Two issues that reliably mobilise the BJP's base. The Congress, by protesting at the Election Commission rather than engaging on the specifics of the SIR, has arguably handed the BJP a sharper talking point than the revision itself warranted. What is missing from this debate is independent data: how many valid voters have historically been struck off during SIR exercises, and what share of BJP objections have been upheld on verification? Without those numbers, both sides are essentially trading allegations. The illegal immigration angle — stretched from Bengaluru's municipal corporations to Chikkamagaluru coffee estates — widens the frame far beyond electoral rolls, signalling that this row will outlast the SIR itself.
NationPress
2 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Karnataka?
The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is a periodic exercise by election authorities to update voter lists by adding eligible new voters and removing entries for those who are deceased, have relocated, or are registered at multiple locations. BJP MLC C.T. Ravi has stated it has been conducted 12 times nationally and is carried out under constitutional and electoral provisions.
Why is Congress opposing the SIR in Karnataka?
Congress leaders, including Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, have reportedly protested the SIR at the Election Commission office, alleging concerns about the manner in which the revision is being conducted. BJP MLC C.T. Ravi has alleged that the opposition is politically motivated, claiming Congress fears that alleged illegal immigrants may be removed from voter lists.
What are C.T. Ravi's allegations about illegal immigrants and Karnataka voter lists?
Ravi alleged that large numbers of alleged Bangladeshi nationals are residing in Bengaluru and other Karnataka cities, as well as in coffee estates in Chikkamagaluru and Madikeri districts. He accused the Congress government of failing to set up an SIT to probe reports of such individuals working in Bengaluru's municipal corporations, and claimed attempts to include them on electoral rolls would undermine democracy.
Who conducts the SIR — central agencies or state officials?
According to C.T. Ravi, nearly 99 per cent of the SIR work is carried out by officials from state government departments, including the Revenue and Education Departments — not central agencies like the ED or CBI. He added that this means the state government bears responsibility if anything goes wrong.
What did Ravi say about EVM hacking allegations by Congress?
Ravi rejected Congress claims that Electronic Voting Machines can be hacked, arguing that if EVMs were manipulated, Congress would not have won elections in Karnataka, Kerala, Telangana, or Himachal Pradesh. He demanded that Congress leaders who made such allegations — including Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, and D.K. Shivakumar — publicly apologise.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest Yesterday
  2. 1 week ago
  3. 1 week ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 3 months ago
  7. 4 months ago
  8. 8 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google