Why Did Calcutta HC Prohibit Kunal Ghosh from Commenting on Mithun Chakraborty for Three Months?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant legal ruling, Kunal Ghosh has been barred from commenting on Mithun Chakraborty for three months after a libel suit. This development has sparked discussions around freedom of speech and the consequences of public statements.
Key Takeaways
- Kunal Ghosh is barred from commenting on Mithun Chakraborty for three months.
- The ruling follows a libel petition worth Rs 100 crore.
- Chakraborty claims Ghosh's comments harmed his social image.
- The next court hearing is set for December.
- Public discourse comes with legal responsibilities.
Kolkata, Sep 24 (NationPress) A single-judge bench of the Calcutta High Court has issued a directive on Wednesday, preventing Kunal Ghosh, the Trinamool Congress state general secretary in West Bengal, from making any form of “public comment” regarding the acclaimed actor and BJP leader, Mithun Chakraborty, for the upcoming three months.
The ruling was made by Justice Arindam Mukherjee following a libel petition amounting to Rs 100 crore filed by Chakraborty against Ghosh.
In his libel petition, Chakraborty accused Ghosh of uttering certain public statements that were not only libellous towards him but also extended to his family members. These comments allegedly harmed his social standing, as stated in Chakraborty’s petition.
During the hearing on Wednesday, Chakraborty’s attorney argued that the libellous comments made by Ghosh publicly damaged the social reputation of both Chakraborty and his family, and also hindered his career prospects as an actor.
After a thorough review of the case, the bench mandated the issuance of a notice to Ghosh and subsequently prohibited him from making any “public comment” about Chakraborty for the next three months.
Recently, Ghosh had made numerous public allegations against the superstar concerning his supposed connections to chit fund organizations. Additionally, he made disparaging remarks regarding Chakraborty’s political shifts, recalling his former role as a Trinamool Congress Rajya Sabha member.
Chakraborty also claimed that Ghosh made libellous and false statements concerning his son and wife.
Initially, Chakraborty had issued a legal notice to Ghosh; however, since the notice did not yield a satisfactory response, he proceeded to file the libel lawsuit in the Calcutta High Court.
The next session in this matter is slated for December this year.
Point of View
The Calcutta High Court's ruling reflects a delicate balance between protecting individual reputations and upholding freedom of speech. While Kunal Ghosh's allegations raise serious questions, the court's intervention signifies the importance of responsible commentary in public discourse. NationPress stands firm in advocating for both accountability and the right to speak freely.
NationPress
11/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted the Calcutta HC to bar Kunal Ghosh?
The Calcutta HC barred Kunal Ghosh from making comments about Mithun Chakraborty due to a libel lawsuit claiming that Ghosh's statements were damaging to Chakraborty's reputation and family.
How long is the prohibition on comments?
The prohibition on public comments regarding Mithun Chakraborty lasts for three months.
What were the allegations made by Kunal Ghosh?
Kunal Ghosh accused Mithun Chakraborty of involvement with chit fund entities and criticized his political affiliations.
When is the next court hearing scheduled?
The next hearing in this matter is scheduled for December of this year.
What are the implications of this ruling?
This ruling emphasizes the need for responsible commentary in public discourse while highlighting the legal consequences of defamatory statements.
