CM Fadnavis Approves 15 New Protected Areas, Expands Tansa Sanctuary
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Fifteen protected areas in one afternoon. Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis chaired the 26th meeting of the Maharashtra State Wildlife Board in Mumbai on Monday, 26 October 2026, and walked out with a sweeping expansion of the state's conservation footprint — approving proposals that stretch from the wild buffalo country of Gadchiroli in the east to the coastal ridgelines of Raigad in the west.
Kolamarka's upgrade: a sanctuary for Maharashtra's wild buffaloes
The headline decision of the meeting was the approval to declare the Kolamarka Conservation Reserve in Gadchiroli district a full Wildlife Sanctuary. The site carries particular ecological weight as one of the few remaining natural habitats for wild buffaloes in peninsular India — a species whose population outside Chhattisgarh's Indravati basin is critically limited. Elevating Kolamarka from a Conservation Reserve to a Sanctuary grants it a higher tier of legal protection under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, tightening restrictions on human activity within its boundaries.
14 new Conservation Reserves from the Sahyadris to Vidarbha
Beyond Kolamarka, the board approved 14 new Conservation Reserves spread across Pune, Raigad, Nashik, Nandurbar, Thane, Palghar and Chandrapur districts. The list — Velhe-Mulshi, Bhor Girigad, Dindori, Surgana, Taharabad, Chinchpada, Alibag, Ghera Manikgad, Lonavala, Guntara, Jawhar, Asherigad, Dhamni and Ekara — reads like a tour of Maharashtra's most sensitive ecological corridors, threading the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot with forest patches in the Vidarbha belt.
Conservation Reserves, a category introduced through the 2002 amendment to the Wildlife Protection Act, allow local communities a degree of participation in governance — making them politically more viable than outright sanctuaries in areas with dense habitation. The sheer number approved in a single sitting signals a deliberate acceleration in coverage.
Tansa expansion and two new Critical Wildlife Habitats
The board also approved adding 588.767 hectares of revenue and private land across six villages to the existing Tansa Wildlife Sanctuary in Thane district, with the explicit goal of making the sanctuary 'human-free.' That phrase, used verbatim in the post, signals an intent to initiate voluntary relocation or settlement of land-use rights — a process that typically involves lengthy negotiations with village communities and state revenue machinery.
Two existing protected areas received Critical Wildlife Habitat designations: 100.139 sq km of Koka Wildlife Sanctuary in Bhandara district and 255.79 sq km of Jayakwadi Bird Sanctuary in Aurangabad district. Critical Wildlife Habitat status, provided under the Forest Rights Act, 2006, is the mechanism through which core areas are formally insulated from any activity incompatible with wildlife conservation.
Infrastructure inside protected zones — the fine print that matters
Alongside the conservation approvals, Fadnavis also directed that routine dam repairs, rehabilitation works and desilting within sanctuaries be folded into official management plans — a move that regularises maintenance that has often proceeded in a legal grey zone. The board approved infrastructure proposals inside protected areas, Eco-Sensitive Zones and tiger corridors, covering irrigation, healthcare facilities, water supply lines, bridges, roads, underground optical fibre networks and electricity lines.
This dual track — tighter conservation designations on one hand, regulated infrastructure permissions on the other — reflects a pattern evident across Indian states navigating the tension between forest protection and rural development. The key legal question going forward is whether the infrastructure approvals are accompanied by mandatory site-specific impact assessments and monitored against the management plans they are now required to enter.
Maharashtra's State Wildlife Board, a statutory advisory body constituted under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, recommends these proposals; formal notifications by the state government are required before any designation takes legal effect. Watch for those gazette notifications — and the management plans that must follow — as the true measure of today's ambition.